Human Sperm Cooperate to Transit Highly Viscous Regions on the Competitive Pathway to Fertilization

Overview

Journal Commun Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2023 May 6

PMID 37149719

Authors

Sa Xiao

Jason Riordon

Alex Lagunov

Mahta Ghaffarzadeh

Thomas Hannam

Reza Nosrati

David Sinton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Human sperm compete for fertilization. Here, we find that human sperm, unexpectedly, cooperate under conditions mimicking the viscosity contrasts in the female reproductive tract. Sperm attach at the head region to migrate as a cooperative group upon transit into and through a high viscosity medium (15-100 cP) from low viscosity seminal fluid. Sperm groups benefit from higher swimming velocity, exceeding that of individual sperm by over 50%. We find that sperm associated with a group possess high DNA integrity (7% fragmentation index) - a stark contrast to individual sperm exhibiting low DNA integrity (> 50% fragmentation index) - and feature membrane decapacitation factors that mediate sperm attachment to form the group. Cooperative behaviour becomes less prevalent upon capacitation and groups tend to disband as the surrounding viscosity reduces. When sperm from different male sources are present, related sperm preferentially form groups and achieve greater swimming velocity, while unrelated sperm are slowed by their involvement in a group. These findings reveal cooperation as a selective mode of human sperm motion - sperm with high DNA integrity cooperate to transit the highly viscous regions in the female tract and outcompete rival sperm for fertilization - and provide insight into cooperation-based sperm selection strategies for assisted reproduction.

References

Wyckoff G, Wang W, Wu C . Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man. Nature. 2000; 403(6767):304-9. DOI: 10.1038/35002070. View

Wilcox A, Weinberg C, Baird D . Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333(23):1517-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199512073332301. View

Fisher H, Giomi L, Hoekstra H, Mahadevan L . The dynamics of sperm cooperation in a competitive environment. Proc Biol Sci. 2014; 281(1790). PMC: 4123693. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0296. View

Eamer L, Vollmer M, Nosrati R, San Gabriel M, Zeidan K, Zini A . Turning the corner in fertility: high DNA integrity of boundary-following sperm. Lab Chip. 2016; 16(13):2418-22. DOI: 10.1039/c6lc00490c. View

Zhang H, Beer A, Florin E, Swinney H . Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(31):13626-30. PMC: 2922251. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1001651107. View

Ding D, Wang Q, Li X, Chen B, Zou W, Ji D . Effects of different polyvinylpyrrolidone concentrations on intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote. 2020; :1-6. DOI: 10.1017/S0967199419000820. View

Pathak D, Wei X, Dey A, Wall D . Molecular recognition by a polymorphic cell surface receptor governs cooperative behaviors in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2013; 9(11):e1003891. PMC: 3820747. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003891. View

Tourmente M, Varea-Sanchez M, Roldan E . Faster and more efficient swimming: energy consumption of murine spermatozoa under sperm competition†. Biol Reprod. 2018; 100(2):420-428. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioy197. View

Aitken R, Nixon B . Sperm capacitation: a distant landscape glimpsed but unexplored. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013; 19(12):785-93. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gat067. View

10.

Yang Y, Elgeti J, Gompper G . Cooperation of sperm in two dimensions: synchronization, attraction, and aggregation through hydrodynamic interactions. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009; 78(6 Pt 1):061903. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.061903. View

11.

Queller D, Ponte E, Bozzaro S, Strassmann J . Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science. 2003; 299(5603):105-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1077742. View

12.

Petit F, Serres C, Bourgeon F, Pineau C, Auer J . Identification of sperm head proteins involved in zona pellucida binding. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(4):852-65. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des452. View

13.

Zini A, Bielecki R, Phang D, Zenzes M . Correlations between two markers of sperm DNA integrity, DNA denaturation and DNA fragmentation, in fertile and infertile men. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(4):674-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01796-9. View

14.

Leahy T, Gadella B . Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage. Reproduction. 2011; 142(6):759-78. DOI: 10.1530/REP-11-0310. View

15.

Sivanarayana T, Ravi Krishna C, Jaya Prakash G, Krishna K, Madan K, Sudhakar G . Sperm DNA fragmentation assay by sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD): correlation between DNA fragmentation and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 13(2):87-94. PMC: 5906886. DOI: 10.1007/s12522-013-0168-7. View

16.

Babcock D, Wandernoth P, Wennemuth G . Episodic rolling and transient attachments create diversity in sperm swimming behavior. BMC Biol. 2014; 12:67. PMC: 4354980. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-014-0067-3. View

17.

Simmons L, Fitzpatrick J . Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility. Reproduction. 2012; 144(5):519-34. DOI: 10.1530/REP-12-0285. View

18.

Guthrie H, Welch G . Effects of reactive oxygen species on sperm function. Theriogenology. 2012; 78(8):1700-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.002. View

19.

Denissenko P, Kantsler V, Smith D, Kirkman-Brown J . Human spermatozoa migration in microchannels reveals boundary-following navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(21):8007-10. PMC: 3361448. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202934109. View

20.

Ivic A, Onyeaka H, Girling A, Brewis I, Ola B, Hammadieh N . Critical evaluation of methylcellulose as an alternative medium in sperm migration tests. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(1):143-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.1.143. View