Evaluation of Distal Tibial Epiphysis and Calcaneal Epiphysis According to the Vieth Method in 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Images: a Pilot Study

Overview

Journal Int J Legal Med

Specialty Forensic Sciences

Date 2023 May 5

PMID 37145316

Authors

Murat Serdar Gurses

Busra Has

Hasan Baki Altinsoy

Halit Sinan Suzen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In forensic medicine practice, age estimation-both in living and deceased individuals-can be requested due to legal requirements. Radiologic methods, such as X-rays, for the estimation of bone age have been discussed, and ethical concerns have been raised. Given these factors, radiologic methods that reduce radiation exposure have gained importance and have become one of the research topics in forensic medicine. In this study, the MR images of the ankles of patients aged between 8 and 25 years, obtained with a 3.0 T MR scanner, were evaluated retrospectively according to the staging method defined by Vieth et al. In the study, the ankle MR images of 201 cases (83 females and 118 males) with sagittal T1-weighted turbo spin echo and T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery sequences were evaluated independently by two observers. According to the results of our study, the intra- and inter-observer agreements are at a very good level for both the distal tibial and calcaneal epiphyses. All the cases detected as stages 2, 3, and 4 in both sexes for both the distal tibial and the calcaneal epiphyses have been determined to be under the age of 18 years. According to the data obtained from our study, we consider that stage 5 for males and stage 6 for both sexes in the distal tibial epiphysis and stage 6 for males in the calcaneal epiphysis can be used to estimate the age of 15 years. As far as we know, our study is the first to evaluate ankle MR images with the method defined by Vieth et al. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the validity of the procedure.

Citing Articles

Third molar eruption in dental panoramic radiographs as a feature for forensic age assessment - new reference data from a German population.

Timme M, Viktorov J, Steffens L, Streeter A, Karch A, Schmeling A Head Face Med. 2024; 20(1):29.

PMID: 38730394 PMC: 11084084. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-024-00431-3.

Timme M, Viktorov J, Steffens L, Streeter A, Karch A, Guo Y Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024; .

PMID: 38727861 DOI: 10.1007/s12024-024-00820-9.

Bone age assessment based on different MRI modalities of the proximal humerus epiphysis: the comparisons of TWI, TWI, and PDWI.

Jiao Y, Tuerhong Y, Chen C, Dai X, Lu T, Peng Z Int J Legal Med. 2024; 138(4):1509-1521.

PMID: 38332350 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-024-03182-7.

References

Hagen M, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Vieth V, Ottow C, Olze A . Forensic age assessment of living adolescents and young adults at the Institute of Legal Medicine, Münster, from 2009 to 2018. Int J Legal Med. 2020; 134(2):745-751. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-019-02239-2. View

Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G . Forensic Age Estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016; 113(4):44-50. PMC: 4760148. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0044. View

Olze A, Solheim T, Schulz R, Kupfer M, Schmeling A . Evaluation of the radiographic visibility of the root pulp in the lower third molars for the purpose of forensic age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 124(3):183-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-009-0415-y. View

Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Muhler M, Wernecke K, Geserick G . Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med. 2003; 118(1):5-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-003-0404-5. View

Buckley M, Clark K . Forensic Age Estimation Using the Medial Clavicular Epiphysis: A Study Review. Radiol Technol. 2017; 88(5):482-498. View

Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch H, Knell B, Ramsthaler F . Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. 2008; 122(6):457-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-008-0254-2. View

Wittschieber D, Ottow C, Vieth V, Kuppers M, Schulz R, Hassu J . Projection radiography of the clavicle: still recommendable for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals?. Int J Legal Med. 2014; 129(1):187-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1067-0. View

Ramsthaler F, Proschek P, Betz W, Verhoff M . How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update. Int J Legal Med. 2009; 123(3):199-204. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-009-0322-2. View

Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Konig M, Geserick G . Statistical analysis and verification of forensic age estimation of living persons in the Institute of Legal Medicine of the Berlin University Hospital Charité. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2003; 5 Suppl 1:S367-71. DOI: 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00134-7. View

10.

Lu T, Shi L, Zhan M, Fan F, Peng Z, Zhang K . Age estimation based on magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle joint in a modern Chinese Han population. Int J Legal Med. 2020; 134(5):1843-1852. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02364-3. View

11.

Vieth V, Schulz R, Heindel W, Pfeiffer H, Buerke B, Schmeling A . Forensic age assessment by 3.0T MRI of the knee: proposal of a new MRI classification of ossification stages. Eur Radiol. 2018; 28(8):3255-3262. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5281-2. View

12.

Kramer J, Schmidt S, Jurgens K, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V . Forensic age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of the distal femur. Int J Legal Med. 2014; 128(3):509-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-0967-3. View

13.

Kramer J, Schmidt S, Jurgens K, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V . The use of magnetic resonance imaging to examine ossification of the proximal tibial epiphysis for forensic age estimation in living individuals. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014; 10(3):306-13. DOI: 10.1007/s12024-014-9559-2. View

14.

Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A . Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med. 2010; 124(4):321-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-010-0448-2. View

15.

Saint-Martin P, Rerolle C, Pucheux J, Dedouit F, Telmon N . Contribution of distal femur MRI to the determination of the 18-year limit in forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med. 2014; 129(3):619-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-014-1020-2. View

16.

Fan F, Zhang K, Peng Z, Cui J, Hu N, Deng Z . Forensic age estimation of living persons from the knee: Comparison of MRI with radiographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2016; 268:145-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.002. View

17.

Ottow C, Schulz R, Pfeiffer H, Heindel W, Schmeling A, Vieth V . Forensic age estimation by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: the definite relevance in bony fusion of the distal femoral- and the proximal tibial epiphyses using closest-to-bone T1 TSE sequence. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(12):5041-5048. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4880-2. View

18.

Altinsoy H, Gurses M, Bogan M, Unlu N . Applicability of 3.0 T MRI images in the estimation of full age based on shoulder joint ossification: Single-centre study. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2020; 47:101767. DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101767. View

19.

Altinsoy H, Gurses M, Alatas O . Evaluation of proximal humeral epiphysis ossification in 3.0 T MR images according to the Dedouit staging method: Is it be used for age of majority?. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020; 77:102095. DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102095. View

20.

Wittschieber D, Chitavishvili N, Papageorgiou I, Malich A, Mall G, Mentzel H . Magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal tibial epiphysis is suitable for statements as to the question of majority: a validation study in forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med. 2021; 136(3):777-784. PMC: 9005400. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02766-x. View