Development and Psychometric Properties of a Friendly Dietary Function Assessment Scale for Home-dwelling People with Dementia

Overview

Journal BMC Nurs

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2023 May 4

PMID 37143032

Authors

Mei-Yin Liu

Hua-Tsen Hsiao

Yi-Ju Chen

Chi-Jane Wang

Jing-Jy Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Mealtime difficulties related to cognitive functioning negatively impact a patient's life during the various stages of dementia, and they typically cause a burden and stress on family caregivers. Most people with dementia live at home alone or are cared for by informal caregivers, typically their spouses or other family members. However, no suitable screening tools for home-dwelling patients with dementia have been developed, nor have measurements focused on executive and self-eating functions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Dietary Function Assessment Scale (DFAS) for community-dwelling persons with dementia.

Methods: A mixed-method design was used to develop the instrument. Methods included a comprehensive literature review to identify the item pool and an expert panel to assess the initial item pool. We performed convenience sampling of 190 home-dwelling people with dementia for psychometrical evaluation. The psychometric properties tests included item and factor analyses, criterion-related validity testing, internal consistency reliability testing, and defining the optimal cut-off values. The study was conducted from 2018 to 2019.

Results: Items were generated based on an extensive literature review and pre-existing scales related to mealtime and executive functions in persons with dementia. The S-CVI/Ave of the DFAS was 0.89. A Principal Component factor analysis demonstrated seven items, with a two-factor structure accounting for 56.94% of the total variance. The two extracted factors were Self-eating ability and Dietary executive function. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good model fit. The criterion-related validity was adequate (r = -0.528, p < 0.01). The reliability of Cronbach's alpha internal consistency was 0.74, and McDonald's Omega coefficient was 0.80; the optimal cut-off value of 13 points with an AUC of 0.74 was established to determine poor dietary functioning in persons with dementia.

Conclusion: The DFAS was simple, user-friendly, and a valid and reliable instrument to assess dietary functioning in community-dwelling persons with dementia. This short scale can be helpful for caretakers, who can use it to identify the dietary needs of home-dwelling persons with dementia and improve their care and eating experience.

References

Mitchell S, Teno J, Kiely D, Shaffer M, Jones R, Prigerson H . The clinical course of advanced dementia. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(16):1529-38. PMC: 2778850. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902234. View

Hsiao H, Chao H, Wang J . Features of problematic eating behaviors among community-dwelling older adults with dementia: family caregivers' experience. Geriatr Nurs. 2013; 34(5):361-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.06.010. View

Mukaka M . Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2013; 24(3):69-71. PMC: 3576830. View

Nakayama N, Suzuki M, Endo A, Nitanda Y, Tanabe N, Watanabe A . Impact of dementia on behavioral independence and disturbance. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016; 17(4):605-613. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12767. View

Ogawa S . Nutritional management of older adults with cognitive decline and dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2014; 14 Suppl 2:17-22. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12252. View

Collette F, Schmidt C, Scherrer C, Adam S, Salmon E . Specificity of inhibitory deficits in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2007; 30(6):875-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.09.007. View

Liu W, Galik E, Boltz M, Nahm E, Resnick B . Optimizing Eating Performance for Older Adults With Dementia Living in Long-term Care: A Systematic Review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015; 12(4):228-35. DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12100. View

Wang S, Chang C, Lee P . [Exploration of Eating Difficulties of Patients With Dementia]. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2016; 63(4):128-34. DOI: 10.6224/JN.63.4.128. View

Volkert D, Chourdakis M, Faxen-Irving G, Fruhwald T, Landi F, Suominen M . ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia. Clin Nutr. 2015; 34(6):1052-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.09.004. View

10.

Spaccavento S, Del Prete M, Craca A, Fiore P . Influence of nutritional status on cognitive, functional and neuropsychiatric deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2008; 48(3):356-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.03.002. View

11.

Amella E, Grant A, Mulloy C . Eating Behavior in Persons With Moderate to Late-stage Dementia: Assessment and Interventions. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011; 13(6):360-7. DOI: 10.1177/1078390307309216. View

12.

Liu W, Cheon J, Thomas S . Interventions on mealtime difficulties in older adults with dementia: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013; 51(1):14-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.021. View

13.

Chang C, Roberts B . Cultural perspectives in feeding difficulty in Taiwanese elderly with dementia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008; 40(3):235-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00231.x. View

14.

Aselage M . Measuring mealtime difficulties: eating, feeding and meal behaviours in older adults with dementia. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(5-6):621-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03129.x. View

15.

Jebb A, Ng V, Tay L . A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995-2019. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:637547. PMC: 8129175. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547. View

16.

Martyr A, Clare L . Executive function and activities of daily living in Alzheimer's disease: a correlational meta-analysis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012; 33(2-3):189-203. DOI: 10.1159/000338233. View

17.

Papachristou I, Giatras N, Ussher M . Impact of dementia progression on food-related processes: a qualitative study of caregivers' perspectives. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2013; 28(6):568-74. PMC: 10852594. DOI: 10.1177/1533317513494456. View

18.

Hajian-Tilaki K . The choice of methods in determining the optimal cut-off value for quantitative diagnostic test evaluation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017; 27(8):2374-2383. DOI: 10.1177/0962280216680383. View

19.

Polit D, Tatano Beck C, Owen S . Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007; 30(4):459-67. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20199. View

20.

Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry P, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S . The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition. 1999; 15(2):116-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00171-3. View