The Effect of the Genomic GC Content Bias of Prokaryotic Organisms on the Secondary Structures of Their Proteins

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 May 4

PMID 37141209

Authors

Diana Barcelo-Antemate

Fernando Fontove-Herrera

Walter Santos

Enrique Merino

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

One of the main characteristics of prokaryotic genomes is the ratio in which guanine-cytosine bases are used in their DNA sequences. This is known as the genomic GC content and varies widely, from values below 20% to values greater than 74%. It has been demonstrated that the genomic GC content varies in accordance with the phylogenetic distribution of organisms and influences the amino acid composition of their corresponding proteomes. This bias is particularly important for amino acids that are coded by GC content-rich codons such as alanine, glycine, and proline, as well as amino acids that are coded by AT-rich codons, such as lysine, asparagine, and isoleucine. In our study, we extend these results by considering the effect of the genomic GC content on the secondary structure of proteins. On a set of 192 representative prokaryotic genomes and proteome sequences, we identified through a bioinformatic study that the composition of the secondary structures of the proteomes varies in relation to the genomic GC content; random coils increase as the genomic GC content increases, while alpha-helices and beta-sheets present an inverse relationship. In addition, we found that the tendency of an amino acid to form part of a secondary structure of proteins is not ubiquitous, as previously expected, but varies according to the genomic GC content. Finally, we discovered that for some specific groups of orthologous proteins, the GC content of genes biases the composition of secondary structures of the proteins for which they code.

References

Tatusov R, Fedorova N, Jackson J, Jacobs A, Kiryutin B, Koonin E . The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003; 4:41. PMC: 222959. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41. View

Levitt M . Conformational preferences of amino acids in globular proteins. Biochemistry. 1978; 17(20):4277-85. DOI: 10.1021/bi00613a026. View

Chen W, Shao Y, Chen F . Evolution of complete proteomes: guanine-cytosine pressure, phylogeny and environmental influences blend the proteomic architecture. BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 13:219. PMC: 3850711. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-219. View

Yan R, Xu D, Yang J, Walker S, Zhang Y . A comparative assessment and analysis of 20 representative sequence alignment methods for protein structure prediction. Sci Rep. 2013; 3:2619. PMC: 3965362. DOI: 10.1038/srep02619. View

Bernardi G . Codon usage and genome composition. J Mol Evol. 1985; 22(4):363-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02115693. View

Kanehisa M, Goto S . KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 28(1):27-30. PMC: 102409. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. View

Edgar R . MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32(5):1792-7. PMC: 390337. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. View

Sueoka N . Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988; 85(8):2653-7. PMC: 280056. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2653. View

Andersson S, Sharp P . Codon usage and base composition in Rickettsia prowazekii. J Mol Evol. 1996; 42(5):525-36. DOI: 10.1007/BF02352282. View

10.

Gu X, Li W . Directional mutational pressure affects the amino acid composition and hydrophobicity of proteins in bacteria. Genetica. 1998; 102-103(1-6):383-91. View

11.

Thomas S, Wagner R, Arakaki A, Skolnick J, Kirby J, Shimkets L . The mosaic genome of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C suggests an aerobic common ancestor to the delta-proteobacteria. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2103. PMC: 2330069. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002103. View

12.

Chou P, Fasman G . Prediction of the secondary structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1978; 47:45-148. DOI: 10.1002/9780470122921.ch2. View

13.

Chou P, Fasman G . Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry. 1974; 13(2):211-22. DOI: 10.1021/bi00699a001. View

14.

Singer G, Hickey D . Nucleotide bias causes a genomewide bias in the amino acid composition of proteins. Mol Biol Evol. 2000; 17(11):1581-8. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026257. View

15.

Lewis P, Go N, Go M, Kotelchuck D, Scheraga H . Helix probability profiles of denatured proteins and their correlation with native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970; 65(4):810-5. PMC: 282987. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.65.4.810. View

16.

Wu H, Zhang Z, Hu S, Yu J . On the molecular mechanism of GC content variation among eubacterial genomes. Biol Direct. 2012; 7:2. PMC: 3274465. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-2. View

17.

Argos P, Palau J . Amino acid distribution in protein secondary structures. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1982; 19(4):380-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1982.tb02619.x. View

18.

Chou P, Fasman G . Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry. 1974; 13(2):222-45. DOI: 10.1021/bi00699a002. View

19.

Kagawa Y, Nojima H, Nukiwa N, Ishizuka M, Nakajima T, Yasuhara T . High guanine plus cytosine content in the third letter of codons of an extreme thermophile. DNA sequence of the isopropylmalate dehydrogenase of Thermus thermophilus. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259(5):2956-60. View

20.

Musto H, Naya H, Zavala A, Romero H, Alvarez-Valin F, Bernardi G . Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 347(1):1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.06.054. View