» Articles » PMID: 37138931

Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods Regarding Serious Illness, Death and Loss (CEIN): a Study Protocol for a Convergent-parallel Mixed-methods Process and Outcome Evaluation That Balances Control and Flexibility

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2023 May 4
PMID 37138931
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. However, study protocols that advise on how to evaluate the impact and complex social change processes underlying these civic engagement initiatives are lacking.

Objectives: The main objective of this study is to describe the study protocol for the evaluation of civic engagement initiatives in serious illness, dying, and loss in two neighbourhoods in Flanders, Belgium.

Design: A convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation for the CEIN study.

Methods & Analysis: We look at the evaluation of CEIN through a critical realist lens, thereby including the social, political, and economic determinants of social change in CEIN, the mechanisms to achieve this social change, the outcomes, and the mutual connection between these three aspects. We will conduct a convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation in which qualitative (i.e. observations, interviews, group discussions, and ego network mapping) and quantitative data (i.e. a pre-post survey) are simultaneously but separately collected and analysed and in the last stage combined by narrative synthesis.

Discussion: This protocol illustrates the difficulty of operationalising the desired long-term impact of social changes regarding serious illness, dying, and loss into more manageable outcomes. We recommend a well-cogitated logic model that connects the outcomes of the study to its potential actions. Applying this protocol in practice is a constant exercise between providing sufficient flexibility to meet feasibility, desirability, and context-specific needs in the CEIN study and providing sufficient guidelines to structure and control the evaluation process.

References
1.
Pannucci C, Wilkins E . Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126(2):619-625. PMC: 2917255. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc. View

2.
Vanderstichelen S, Dury S, De Gieter S, Van Droogenbroeck F, De Moortel D, Hove L . Researching Compassionate Communities From an Interdisciplinary Perspective: The Case of the Compassionate Communities Center of Expertise. Gerontologist. 2022; 62(10):1392-1401. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac034. View

3.
Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gotzsche P, Krleza-Jeric K . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(3):200-7. PMC: 5114123. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. View

4.
Collins A, Brown J, Mills J, Philip J . The impact of public health palliative care interventions on health system outcomes: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2020; 35(3):473-485. DOI: 10.1177/0269216320981722. View

5.
Fetters M, Curry L, Creswell J . Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013; 48(6 Pt 2):2134-56. PMC: 4097839. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117. View