» Articles » PMID: 37138145

Early Surgery? In-house Mortality After Proximal Femoral Fractures Does Not Increase for Surgery Up to 48 h After Admission

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 May 3
PMID 37138145
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The economic cost linked to the increasing number of proximal femur fracture and their postoperative care is immense. Mortality rates are high. As early surgery is propagated to lower mortality and reduce complication rates, a 24-h target for surgery is requested. It was our aim to determine the cut-off for the time to surgery from admission and therefore establish a threshold at which the in-house mortality rate changes.

Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted including 1796 patients with an average age of 82.03 years treated operatively for a proximal femoral fracture between January 2016 and June 2020. A single treatment protocol was performed based on the type of anticoagulant, surgery, and renal function. Patient data, surgical procedure, time to surgery, complications, and mortality were assessed.

Results: In-house mortality rate was 3.95%, and the overall complication rate was 22.7%. A prolonged length of hospital stay was linked to patient age and occurrence of complications. Mortality is influenced by age, number of comorbidities BMI, and postoperative complications of which the most relevant is pneumonia. The mean time to surgery for the entire cohort was 26.4 h. The investigation showed no significant difference in mortality rate among the two groups treated within 24 h and 24 to 48 h while comparing all patients treated within 48 h and after 48 h revealed a significant difference in mortality.

Conclusions: Age and number of comorbidities significantly influence mortality rates. Time to surgery is not the main factor influencing outcome after proximal femur fractures, and mortality rates do not differ for surgery up to 48 h after admission. Our data suggest that a 24-h target is not necessary, and the first 48 h may be used for optimizing preoperative patient status if necessary.

Citing Articles

Outcome of Centenarians with Hip Fracture: An Analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).

Pass B, Knobe M, Schmidt H, Bliemel C, Aigner R, Liener U J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518560 PMC: 11546793. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216421.


The Rising Problem of Hip Fractures in Geriatric Patients-Analysis of Surgical Influences on the Outcome.

Krickl J, Ittermann T, Thannheimer A, Schmidt W, Willauschus M, Ruether J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(8).

PMID: 37623521 PMC: 10455730. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081271.

References
1.
Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jarvinen M . Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996; 18(1 Suppl):57S-63S. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00381-9. View

2.
Melton 3rd L . Epidemiology of hip fractures: implications of the exponential increase with age. Bone. 1996; 18(3 Suppl):121S-125S. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00492-0. View

3.
Rupp M, Walter N, Pfeifer C, Lang S, Kerschbaum M, Krutsch W . The Incidence of Fractures Among the Adult Population of Germany–an Analysis From 2009 through 2019. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021; 118(40):665-669. PMC: 8727861. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0238. View

4.
Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J . Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations.... Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:136. PMC: 3880487. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1. View

5.
Kempenaers K, Van Calster B, Vandoren C, Sermon A, Metsemakers W, Vanderschot P . Are the current guidelines for surgical delay in hip fractures too rigid? A single center assessment of mortality and economics. Injury. 2018; 49(6):1169-1175. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.032. View