Shared and Item-specific Information in Memory for Event Descriptions

Overview

Journal Mem Cognit

Specialty Psychology

Date 1986 Jan 1

PMID 3713506

Citations 4

Authors

R R Hunt

J A Ausley

E E Schultz Jr

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks.

Huff M, Bodner G J Mem Lang. 2014; 73:43-58.

PMID: 25018583 PMC: 4088266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.004.

Beyond category sorting and pleasantness rating: inducing relational and item-specific processing.

Hodge M, Otani H Mem Cognit. 1996; 24(1):110-5.

PMID: 8822163 DOI: 10.3758/bf03197277.

Memory for script actions: effects of relevance and detail expectancy.

Maki R Mem Cognit. 1990; 18(1):5-14.

PMID: 2314228 DOI: 10.3758/bf03202640.

Spacing judgments as an index of integration from context-induced relational processing: implications for the free recall of ambiguous prose passages.

STERN L, Dahlgren R, Gaffney L Mem Cognit. 1991; 19(6):579-92.

PMID: 1758304 DOI: 10.3758/bf03197153.

References

Begg I . Similarity and contrast in memory for relations. Mem Cognit. 2013; 6(5):509-17. DOI: 10.3758/BF03198239. View

Ritchey G . Picture superiority in free recall: the effects of organization and elaboration. J Exp Child Psychol. 1980; 29(3):460-74. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(80)90107-1. View

Humphreys M, Bain J . Recognition memory: a cue and information analysis. Mem Cognit. 1983; 11(6):583-600. DOI: 10.3758/bf03198283. View

Glenberg A . Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Mem Cognit. 1979; 7(2):95-112. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197590. View

Mandler G, Goodman G . The word-frequency paradox in recognition. Mem Cognit. 1982; 10(1):33-42. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197623. View