» Articles » PMID: 37133690

Associations of Childhood Allergies with Parental Reproductive and Allergy History

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 May 3
PMID 37133690
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: There has been a noted parallel rise in both the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) to conceive and childhood allergies in the last few decades. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible association between reproductive and allergy history in parents and allergies in their children.

Methods: This exploratory study used a cross-sectional study design and web-based survey to collect anonymous data on demographics, allergy, and health history from parents and about each of their children under 18 years of age. Children were stratified into two groups by allergy status (yes/no), and associations between each variable and the odds of allergies were tested using univariable and multivariable mixed logistic regression models.

Results: Of the 563 children in the study, 237 were reported to have allergies whereas 326 did not. Age, residential community, household income, mode of conception, paternal age at conception, biological parental allergy status, and history of asthma and eczema were significantly associated with allergies in univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis revealed household income ($50 k to $99 k vs ≥ $200 k adj OR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.11, 6.65), biological parental allergies (mother-adj OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.59, 4.72, father-adj OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.24, 3.41) and each additional year of age of children (adj OR 1.17, CI 1.10, 1.24) were significantly associated with odds of allergies in children.

Conclusion: Although the exploratory nature of this convenience, snowballing sample limited the generalizability of the findings, initial observations warrant further investigation and validation in a larger more diverse population.

References
1.
Halliday J, Wilson C, Hammarberg K, Doyle L, Bruinsma F, McLachlan R . Comparing indicators of health and development of singleton young adults conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(4):1055-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.006. View

2.
Tierney K, Cai Y . Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment. Fertil Steril. 2019; 112(6):1136-1143.e4. PMC: 6986780. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1323. View

3.
Eggesbo M, Botten G, Stigum H, Nafstad P, Magnus P . Is delivery by cesarean section a risk factor for food allergy?. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 112(2):420-6. DOI: 10.1067/mai.2003.1610. View

4.
Garn H, Potaczek D, Pfefferle P . The Hygiene Hypothesis and New Perspectives-Current Challenges Meeting an Old Postulate. Front Immunol. 2021; 12:637087. PMC: 8012489. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.637087. View

5.
Sunderam S, Kissin D, Zhang Y, Folger S, Boulet S, Warner L . Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019; 68(4):1-23. PMC: 6493873. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6804a1. View