» Articles » PMID: 37129781

Mechanical Properties of Fresh, Frozen and Vitrified Articular Cartilage

Overview
Journal Ann Biomed Eng
Date 2023 May 2
PMID 37129781
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Osteochondral allograft transplantations are typically used to treat focal articular cartilage injuries where the damaged cartilage is replaced with fresh cadaveric donor grafts. Despite the notable success rate of this procedure, it is limited by fresh donor tissue availability which can only be stored for approximately 28 days after harvest. Vitrification, a form of cryopreservation, can extend the storage time of cartilage. Although it has shown to preserve chondrocyte viability, its effect on the mechanical properties of the tissue has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, in this study, the mechanical properties of fresh, frozen, and vitrified articular cartilage were evaluated through unconfined compression testing. Results showed that the peak modulus, equilibrium modulus, and relaxation time constants of the vitrified and control samples (tested one day after harvest) were similar and higher than the fresh (tested 21 days after harvest) and frozen samples. This demonstrated that vitrification does not adversely affect the mechanical properties of cartilage and can be used as an alternative to fresh allografts which are limited by storage time. The fresh samples also had inferior mechanical properties compared to the control samples suggesting that vitrified allografts could potentially improve clinical outcomes in addition to increasing donor tissue availability.

Citing Articles

Current State and Challenges of Tissue and Organ Cryopreservation in Biobanking.

Khaydukova I, Ivannikova V, Zhidkov D, Belikov N, Peshkova M, Timashev P Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39456905 PMC: 11508709. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011124.

References
1.
Andrews S, Rattner J, Shrive N, Ronsky J . Swelling significantly affects the material properties of the menisci in compression. J Biomech. 2015; 48(8):1485-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.001. View

2.
Brockbank K, MacLellan W, Xie J, Hamm-Alvarez S, Chen Z, Schenke-Layland K . Quantitative second harmonic generation imaging of cartilage damage. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008; 9(4):299-307. DOI: 10.1007/s10561-008-9070-7. View

3.
Buckwalter J . Activity vs. rest in the treatment of bone, soft tissue and joint injuries. Iowa Orthop J. 1995; 15:29-42. PMC: 2329066. View

4.
Cetinkaya G, Arat S . Cryopreservation of cartilage cell and tissue for biobanking. Cryobiology. 2011; 63(3):292-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2011.09.143. View

5.
Chokhandre S, Erdemir A . A comprehensive testing protocol for macro-scale mechanical characterization of knee articular cartilage with documented experimental repeatability. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 112:104025. PMC: 7655550. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104025. View