» Articles » PMID: 37124835

A Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Effect of Mandibular Advancement Device at Two Different Horizontal Jaw Positions in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 May 1
PMID 37124835
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Statement Of Problem: Studies pertaining to the objective assessments of the efficacy of mandibular advancement device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea are scarce.

Purpose: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of MAD at two different horizontal positions of mandible on upper airway dimensions through computed tomography.

Material And Methods: Twenty-nine consenting participants satisfying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled and an adjustable two-piece MAD was fabricated at 50% maximum mandibular protrusion and after 4 weeks was adjusted to 70% protrusion. CT scans were obtained at baseline, 4 weeks after delivering MAD with 50% mandibular protrusion, and then after 4 weeks with 70% mandibular protrusion. Cross sectional area with diameters (lateral and anteroposterior) of upper airway was measured at three specific anatomic levels (retropalatal-RP, retroglossal-RG, and epiglottal-EG). Data were analyzed using the Student t-test for parametric analysis.

Results: Intragroup comparison revealed a statistically significant increase in lateral & anteroposterior dimensions as well as cross sectional area at all three anatomical levels at 4 weeks after MAD with 50% mandibular protrusion compared with baseline and 4 weeks after MAD with 70% mandibular protrusion compared with baseline. However, the difference between lateral and anteroposterior dimensions with MAD at 70% protrusion compared with MAD at 50% protrusion was not statistically significant. The difference between cross-sectional area was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: Mandibular advancement device at 70% mandibular protrusion is more effective compared with the device at 50% protrusion in relieving oropharyngeal obstruction seen in OSA.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Diagnostic Imaging on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Feedback from a Narrative Review.

Lavalle S, Caranti A, Iannella G, Pace A, Lentini M, Maniaci A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941168 PMC: 11816599. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030238.

References
1.
Guilleminault C, Li K, Chen N, Poyares D . Two-point palatal discrimination in patients with upper airway resistance syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, and normal control subjects. Chest. 2002; 122(3):866-70. DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.3.866. View

2.
Kaur A, Chand P, Singh R, Siddhartha R, Tripathi A, Tripathi S . Computed tomographic evaluation of the effects of mandibular advancement devices on pharyngeal dimension changes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Int J Prosthodont. 2012; 25(5):497-505. View

3.
Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S . The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328(17):1230-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199304293281704. View

4.
Lin C, Davidson T, Ancoli-Israel S . Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnea and treatment implications. Sleep Med Rev. 2008; 12(6):481-96. PMC: 2642982. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2007.11.003. View

5.
Li G . Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013; 43(2):63-9. PMC: 3691375. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.63. View