» Articles » PMID: 37124718

Toward a Quasi-dynamic Pulsed Field Electroporation Numerical Model for Cardiac Ablation: Predicting Tissue Conductance Changes and Ablation Lesion Patterns

Overview
Date 2023 May 1
PMID 37124718
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has the potential to evolve into an efficient alternative to traditional RF ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment. However, achieving irreversible tissue electroporation is critical to suppressing arrhythmic pathways, raising the need for accurate lesion characterization. To understand the physics behind the tissue response PFA, we propose a quasi-dynamic model that quantifies tissue conductance at end-electroporation and identifies regions that have undergone fully irreversible electroporation (IRE). The model uses several parameters and numerically solves the electrical field diffusion into the tissue by iteratively updating the tissue conductance until equilibrium at end-electroporation. The model yields a steady-state tissue conductance map used to identify the irreversible lesion. We conducted numerical experiments mimicking a lasso catheter featuring nine 3-mm electrodes spaced circumferentially at 3.75 mm and fired sequentially using a 1500 V and 3000 V pulse amplitude. The IRE lesion region has a surface area and volume of 780 mm and 1411 mm, respectively, at 1500 V, and 1178 mm and 2760 mm, respectively, at 3000 V. Lesion discontinuity was observed at 5.0 mm depth with 1500 V, and 7.2 mm depth with 3000 V. This quasi-dynamic model yields tissue conductance maps, predicts irreversible lesion and lesion penumbra at end-electroporation, and confirms larger lesions with higher pulse amplitudes.

References
1.
Mali B, Jarm T, corovic S, Paulin-Kosir M, Cemazar M, Sersa G . The effect of electroporation pulses on functioning of the heart. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008; 46(8):745-57. PMC: 2491703. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0346-7. View

2.
corovic S, Lackovic I, Sustaric P, Sustar T, Rodic T, Miklavcic D . Modeling of electric field distribution in tissues during electroporation. Biomed Eng Online. 2013; 12:16. PMC: 3614452. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-16. View

3.
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim Y, Saad E, Aguinaga L . 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017; 14(10):e275-e444. PMC: 6019327. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012. View

4.
Muthalaly R, John R, Schaeffer B, Tanigawa S, Nakamura T, Kapur S . Temporal trends in safety and complication rates of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018; 29(6):854-860. DOI: 10.1111/jce.13484. View

5.
Linte C, Camp J, Rettmann M, Haemmerich D, Aktas M, Huang D . Lesion modeling, characterization, and visualization for image-guided cardiac ablation therapy monitoring. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018; 5(2):021218. PMC: 5831757. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021218. View