» Articles » PMID: 37123705

Do Patients Accurately Recall Their Preoperative Symptoms After Elective Orthopedic Procedures?

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2023 May 1
PMID 37123705
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures are a frequent tool used to assess orthopedic surgical outcomes. However, recall bias is a potential limitation of these tools when used retrospectively, as they rely on patients to accurately recall their preoperative symptoms. A database search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline Ovid, and Scopus until May 2021 was completed in duplicate by two reviewers. Studies considered eligible for inclusion were those which reported on patient recall bias associated with orthopedic surgery. The primary outcome of interest investigated was the accuracy of patient recollection of preoperative health status. Any factors that were identified as affecting patient recall were secondary outcomes of interest. Of the 4,065 studies initially screened, 20 studies with 3,454 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, there were 2,371 (69%) knee and hip patients, 422 (12%) shoulder patients, 370 (11%) spine patients, 208 (6%) other upper extremity patients, and 83 (2%) foot and ankle patients. Out of the eight studies that evaluated patient recall within three months postoperatively, seven studies concluded that patient recall is accurate. Out of the 13 studies that evaluated patient recall beyond three months postoperatively, nine studies concluded that patient recall is inaccurate. The accuracy of patient recall of preoperative symptoms after elective orthopedic procedures is not reliable beyond three months postoperatively.

Citing Articles

Can KOOS-PS be replaced with a simple anchor question in patients after total knee arthroplasty?: an agreement study of 2,478 primary surgeries.

Winther S, Sjostrom A, Liabakk-Selli S, Foss O, Wik T, Klaksvik J Acta Orthop. 2024; 95:639-644.

PMID: 39531519 PMC: 11558857. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42098.


Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction.

Khan A, Vaughan A, Aman Z, Lazarus M, Williams G, Namdari S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731077 PMC: 11084458. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092550.

References
1.
Yeoman T, Clement N, MacDonald D, Moran M . Recall of preoperative Oxford Hip and Knee Scores one year after arthroplasty is an alternative and reliable technique when used for a cohort of patients. Bone Joint Res. 2018; 7(5):351-356. PMC: 5987682. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.75.BJR-2017-0259.R1. View

2.
Gagnier J . Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Orthop Res. 2017; 35(10):2098-2108. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23604. View

3.
Lingard E, Wright E, Sledge C . Pitfalls of using patient recall to derive preoperative status in outcome studies of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(8):1149-56. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00003. View

4.
Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Chandler J, Welch V, Higgins J . Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10:ED000142. PMC: 10284251. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142. View

5.
Murphy M, Vardi R, Journeaux S, Whitehouse S . A patient's recollection of pre-operative status is not accurate one year after arthroplasty of the hip or knee. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(8):1070-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35809. View