» Articles » PMID: 37120647

Structure-forming CAG/CTG Repeats Interfere with Gap Repair to Cause Repeat Expansions and Chromosome Breaks

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Apr 29
PMID 37120647
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Expanded CAG/CTG repeats are sites of DNA damage, leading to repeat length changes. Homologous recombination (HR) is one cause of repeat instability and we hypothesized that gap filling was a driver of repeat instability during HR. To test this, we developed an assay such that resection and ssDNA gap fill-in would occur across a (CAG) or (CTG) repeat tract. When the ssDNA template was a CTG sequence, there were increased repeat contractions and a fragile site was created leading to large-scale deletions. When the CTG sequence was on the resected strand, resection was inhibited, resulting in repeat expansions. Increased nucleolytic processing by deletion of Rad9, the ortholog of 53BP1, rescued repeat instability and chromosome breakage. Loss of Rad51 increased contractions implicating a protective role for Rad51 on ssDNA. Together, our work implicates structure-forming repeats as an impediment to resection and gap-filling which can lead to mutations and large-scale deletions.

Citing Articles

Thirty Years of BRCA1: Mechanistic Insights and Their Impact on Mutation Carriers.

Moser S, Jonkers J Cancer Discov. 2025; 15(3):461-480.

PMID: 40025950 PMC: 11893084. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-1326.


Localization of Potential Energy in Hydrogen Bonds of the Gene.

Drobotenko M, Lyasota O, Dzhimak S, Svidlov A, Baryshev M, Leontyeva O Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940702 PMC: 11816898. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26030933.


APOBEC3A deaminates CTG hairpin loops to promote fragility and instability of expanded CAG/CTG repeats.

Brown R, Coxon M, Larsen B, Allison M, Chadha A, Mittelstadt I Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(2):e2408179122.

PMID: 39772743 PMC: 11745325. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2408179122.


DNA polymerase zeta can efficiently replicate structures formed by AT/TA repeat sequences and prevent their deletion.

Das M, Hile S, Brewster J, Boer J, Bezalel-Buch R, Guo Q Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 53(3).

PMID: 39727171 PMC: 11797062. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae1254.


Recurrent DNA nicks drive massive expansions of (GAA) repeats.

Li L, Scott W, Khristich A, Armenia J, Mirkin S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(49):e2413298121.

PMID: 39585990 PMC: 11626148. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2413298121.


References
1.
Polleys E, Freudenreich C . Homologous recombination within repetitive DNA. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2021; 71:143-153. PMC: 8671197. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.08.005. View

2.
Polleys E, House N, Freudenreich C . Role of recombination and replication fork restart in repeat instability. DNA Repair (Amst). 2017; 56:156-165. PMC: 5541998. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.018. View

3.
Hicks W, Kim M, Haber J . Increased mutagenesis and unique mutation signature associated with mitotic gene conversion. Science. 2010; 329(5987):82-5. PMC: 4254764. DOI: 10.1126/science.1191125. View

4.
Tsaponina O, Haber J . Frequent Interchromosomal Template Switches during Gene Conversion in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell. 2014; 55(4):615-25. PMC: 4150392. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.025. View

5.
Kovtun I, McMurray C . Trinucleotide expansion in haploid germ cells by gap repair. Nat Genet. 2001; 27(4):407-11. DOI: 10.1038/86906. View