» Articles » PMID: 37119305

Expansile Gas Concentration in Primary Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment Repair, Effect on Intraocular Pressure and Outcomes; the Manchester Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment Study

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2023 Apr 29
PMID 37119305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of isovolumetric and expansile gas tamponade concentrations on single surgery anatomical success (SSAS) and day 1 intraocular pressure (IOPD1) following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for mild-moderate complexity primary pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (PRD).

Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective continuous and comparative study on eyes that had undergone small-gauge PPV using isovolumetric versus expansile gas for PRD repair between 2011 and 2020 at a single tertiary vitreoretinal centre in UK. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) using preoperative findings as covariates to account for relevant confounders. Significant risk factors such as proliferative vitreoretinopathy C or giant retinal tears were excluded.

Results: From 456 eyes, PSM analysis matched 240 eyes with 120 in each group. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 96 (59 to 218) days. The SSAS was 229/240 (95.8%) overall; 115/120 (95.8%) and 114/120 (95.0%) in isovolumetric and expansile groups, respectively (p = 1.000). Relative to the isovolumetric group, the expansile group had lower proportion of eyes with IOP ≤ 21 mmHg (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, 0.40 [0.23-0.68], p < 0.001); but significantly higher number of eyes with IOP ≥ 22 mmHg (2.53 [1.48-4.34], p < 0.001), ≥ 25 mmHg (2.77 [1.43-5.33], p < 0.001), ≥ 30 mmHg (2.90 [1.28-6.58], p = 0.006) and ≥ 40 mmHg (p = 0.029, isovolumetric: 0 [0%] vs expansile group: 6 [5%]). There was only one case of hypotony (≤ 5 mmHg) 1/240 (0.4%) which occurred in the expansile group.

Conclusions: Expansile gas concentration does not impact SSAS but is associated with significantly raised IOPD1 with no reduction in hypotony rates following PPV for primary PRD.

Citing Articles

Thirteen year experience of vitrectomy and air tamponade for primary retinal detachment repair with clinical outcomes.

Mete M, Maggio E, Prigione G, Bruni E, Maraone G, Tripodi S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28570.

PMID: 39562676 PMC: 11577069. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79889-9.


Incidence of early complications requiring treatment plan changes after vitreoretinal surgery: a single-center study in South Korea.

Yoon J, Kim J, Kim C, Kim J BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):282.

PMID: 37332012 PMC: 10278256. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03030-z.

References
1.
Mateo-Montoya A, Smet M . Air as tamponade for retinal detachments. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013; 24(2):242-6. DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000373. View

2.
Modi A, Giridhar A, Gopalakrishnan M . SULFURHEXAFLUORIDE (SF6) VERSUS PERFLUOROPROPANE (C3F8) GAS AS TAMPONADE IN MACULAR HOLE SURGERY. Retina. 2017; 37(2):283-290. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001124. View

3.
Kontos A, Tee J, Stuart A, Shalchi Z, Williamson T . Duration of intraocular gases following vitreoretinal surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 255(2):231-236. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3438-3. View

4.
Moussa G, Mathews N, Makhzoum O, Park D . Retinal Detachment Repair With Vitrectomy: Air Tamponade Integration to a Vitreoretinal Service, Comparison With Gas Tamponade, and Literature Review. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022; 53(2):87-95. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20220121-02. View

5.
Tan H, Lesnik Oberstein S, Mura M, Bijl H . Air versus gas tamponade in retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 97(1):80-2. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302140. View