Socioeconomic Inequalities in Sport Participation: Pattern Per Sport and Time Trends - a Repeated Cross-sectional Study

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Apr 28

PMID 37118691

Authors

Viviane Richard

Giovanni Piumatti

Nick Pullen

Elsa Lorthe

Idris Guessous

Nicola Cantoreggi

Silvia Stringhini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Sport participation is an important component of a healthy lifestyle and is known to be more common among privileged individuals. However, few studies examined socio-demographic patterns of participation by type of activity. This study aims at quantifying socio-economic inequalities in sport participation by sport type, and to analyse their trend over 15 years.

Methods: We used 2005-2019 data from the Bus Santé study, a yearly population-based cross-sectional survey of Geneva adults. Sport participation was defined as reporting at least one sporting activity over the previous week; educational level, household income and occupational position were used as indicators of socio-economic position. Socio-economic inequalities in sport participation, and their trend over time, were examined using the relative and slope indexes of inequality (RII/SII).

Results: Out of 7769 participants (50.8% women, mean age 46 years old), 60% participated in a sporting activity. Results showed that the higher the socioeconomic circumstances, the higher the sport participation (RII = 1.78; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.64-1.92; SII = 0.33; 95%CI: 0.29-0.37 for education). Relative inequalities varied per sport e.g., 0.68 (95%CI: 0.44-1.07) for football and 4.25 (95%CI: 2.68-6.75) for tennis/badminton for education. Yearly absolute inequalities in sport participation tended to increase between 2005 and 2019 for household income, especially among women and older adults.

Conclusions: We observed strong socio-economic inequalities in sport participation in Geneva, with different magnitude depending on the sport type. These inequalities seemed to increase over the 2005-2019 period. Our results call for tailored measures to promote the participation of socially disadvantaged populations in sporting activities.

Citing Articles

The effect of cultural capital on the physical fitness level of a Chinese older adult population: chain mediation of household income and stockpiling of physical fitness goods.

Zhao D, Wang Y, Zhang A, He J, Gao Y, Chen X Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1473775.

PMID: 39624417 PMC: 11609571. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1473775.

Twelve-year (2008-2019) trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors in a Swiss representative survey of the general population.

de Mestral C, Piumatti G, Nehme M, Guessous I, Stringhini S Prev Med Rep. 2024; 45:102823.

PMID: 39081844 PMC: 11286997. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102823.

References

Warburton D, Nicol C, Bredin S . Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006; 174(6):801-9. PMC: 1402378. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. View

OMara-Eves A, Brunton G, Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Jamal F, Thomas J . The effectiveness of community engagement in public health interventions for disadvantaged groups: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:129. PMC: 4374501. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1352-y. View

Bernstein M, Sloutskis D, Kumanyika S, Sparti A, Schutz Y, Morabia A . Data-based approach for developing a physical activity frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147(2):147-54. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009427. View

Ding D, Do A, Schmidt H, Bauman A . A Widening Gap? Changes in Multiple Lifestyle Risk Behaviours by Socioeconomic Status in New South Wales, Australia, 2002-2012. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135338. PMC: 4546406. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135338. View

Shrestha S, Kestens Y, Thomas F, El Aarbaoui T, Chaix B . Spatial access to sport facilities from the multiple places visited and sport practice: Assessing and correcting biases related to selective daily mobility. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 236:112406. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112406. View

Hoebel J, Finger J, Kuntz B, Kroll L, Manz K, Lange C . Changing educational inequalities in sporting inactivity among adults in Germany: a trend study from 2003 to 2012. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17(1):547. PMC: 5461755. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4478-2. View

Withall J, Jago R, Fox K . Why some do but most don't. Barriers and enablers to engaging low-income groups in physical activity programmes: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:507. PMC: 3141466. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-507. View

Pedersen M, Hansen A, Elmose-Osterlund K . Motives and Barriers Related to Physical Activity and Sport across Social Backgrounds: Implications for Health Promotion. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11). PMC: 8198157. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115810. View

Beenackers M, Kamphuis C, Giskes K, Brug J, Kunst A, Burdorf A . Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:116. PMC: 3491027. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-116. View

10.

Hanibuchi T, Nakaya T, Honjo K . Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health, smoking, and physical activity of Japanese adults from 2000 to 2010. SSM Popul Health. 2018; 2:662-673. PMC: 5757786. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.002. View

11.

Marques A, Sarmento H, Martins J, Saboga Nunes L . Prevalence of physical activity in European adults - Compliance with the World Health Organization's physical activity guidelines. Prev Med. 2015; 81:333-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.018. View

12.

Cerin E, Leslie E . How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 66(12):2596-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.012. View

13.

Karusisi N, Thomas F, Meline J, Chaix B . Spatial accessibility to specific sport facilities and corresponding sport practice: the RECORD Study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:48. PMC: 3641972. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-48. View

14.

Kirk M, Rhodes R . Occupation correlates of adults' participation in leisure-time physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(4):476-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.015. View

15.

Hebert J, Ebbeling C, Matthews C, Hurley T, Ma Y, Druker S . Systematic errors in middle-aged women's estimates of energy intake: comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water. Ann Epidemiol. 2002; 12(8):577-86. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00297-6. View

16.

Mackenbach J, Kunst A . Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44(6):757-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00073-1. View

17.

Scholes S, Bann D . Education-related disparities in reported physical activity during leisure-time, active transportation, and work among US adults: repeated cross-sectional analysis from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2007 to 2016. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):926. PMC: 6064072. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5857-z. View

18.

Hu Y, van Lenthe F, Borsboom G, Looman C, Bopp M, Burstrom B . Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 17 European countries between 1990 and 2010. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016; 70(7):644-52. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-206780. View

19.

Gugusheff J, Foley B, Owen K, Drayton B, Ding D, Stamatakis E . Trends in Walking, Moderate, and Vigorous Physical Activity Participation Across the Socioeconomic Gradient in New South Wales, Australia From 2002 to 2015. J Phys Act Health. 2020; 17(11):1125-1133. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0070. View

20.

Eime R, Young J, Harvey J, Charity M, Payne W . A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013; 10:135. PMC: 4028858. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-135. View