» Articles » PMID: 37116937

Addressing the Need for a Preexposure Prophylaxis Monitoring and Evaluation Implementation Guide: Experience From Zambia

Abstract

Background: The HIV care continuum comprises well-defined steps and indicators. In contrast, indicators along the preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) cascade are still in the early stages of implementation. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of PrEP services is critical to optimizing PrEP uptake and adherence during periods of HIV risk. We provide an overview of global indicators for PrEP, describe the development process and outcomes of Zambia's 2022 , and discuss the guide's implications for other countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

National M&e Guide Development Process: During the scale-up of PrEP, the Zambia Ministry of Health (MOH) and the National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council recognized the need for a national unified monitoring system to guide the effective implementation of PrEP services. Stakeholders from the MOH, civil society, professional organizations, funding agencies, and implementing partners developed the . This guide is aligned with the existing global indicators from the World Health Organization and the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and adapted to the country's needs, context, and health information systems. Zambia's experience in developing the guide has highlighted the importance of strengthening client-level monitoring systems for HIV prevention, ensuring flexibility of the PrEP monitoring system to accommodate PrEP delivery modalities and differentiated service delivery models, and training health workers to enhance PrEP services and deliver care PrEP services along the continuum to prevent HIV acquisition effectively.

Conclusions: Using a collaborative and consensus-based approach, Zambia developed its first national PrEP M&E implementation guide to provide standardized guidelines for optimizing the delivery, monitoring, and evaluation of PrEP service delivery. Zambia's experience can inform other countries in sub-Saharan Africa as they develop national M&E implementation approaches for PrEP.

Citing Articles

Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation in South Africa: a case study of USAID-supported programs.

Milimu J, Parmley L, Matjeng M, Madibane M, Mabika M, Livington J Front Reprod Health. 2024; 6:1473354.

PMID: 39720121 PMC: 11666530. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1473354.


Awareness and willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis among the University of Zambia students: A cross-sectional study.

Kampamba M, Nelumbu N, Hikaambo C, Mudenda S, Hangoma J, Kunda M Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(9):e70060.

PMID: 39257911 PMC: 11386235. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70060.


Programme science in action: lessons from an observational study of HIV prevention programming for key populations in Lusaka, Zambia.

Sikazwe I, Musheke M, Chiyenu K, Ngosa B, Pry J, Mulubwa C J Int AIDS Soc. 2024; 27 Suppl 2:e26237.

PMID: 38982890 PMC: 11233926. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26237.


Barriers and facilitators to uptake and persistence on prep among key populations in Southern Province, Zambia: a thematic analysis.

Stoebenau K, Muchanga G, Ahmad S, Bwalya C, Mwale M, Toussaint S BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1617.

PMID: 38886691 PMC: 11184712. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19152-y.


Lessons learnt from daily oral PrEP delivery to inform national planning for PrEP ring introduction for women in low-income and middle-income countries: a qualitative inquiry of international stakeholders.

Heck C, Dam A, Yohannes K, Deacon J, Kripke K, Meyers K BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(5).

PMID: 38770814 PMC: 11085820. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014709.


References
1.
Heffron R, Ngure K, Odoyo J, Bulya N, Tindimwebwa E, Hong T . Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-negative persons with partners living with HIV: uptake, use, and effectiveness in an open-label demonstration project in East Africa. Gates Open Res. 2019; 1:3. PMC: 5757790. DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.12752.2. View

2.
de Wit M, Rice B, Risher K, Welty S, Waruiru W, Magutshwa S . Experiences and lessons learned from the real-world implementation of an HIV recent infection testing algorithm in three routine service-delivery settings in Kenya and Zimbabwe. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1):596. PMC: 8220670. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06619-6. View

3.
Allorant A, Parrish C, Desforges G, Robin E, Honore J, Puttkammer N . Closing the gap in implementation of HIV clinical guidelines in a low resource setting using electronic medical records. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):804. PMC: 7449080. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05613-8. View

4.
Golub S . PrEP Stigma: Implicit and Explicit Drivers of Disparity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018; 15(2):190-197. PMC: 5884731. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-018-0385-0. View

5.
Eakle R, Weatherburn P, Bourne A . Understanding user perspectives of and preferences for oral PrEP for HIV prevention in the context of intervention scale-up: a synthesis of evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019; 22 Suppl 4:e25306. PMC: 6643067. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25306. View