Editorial Comment: Diagnostic Performance of MRI and US in Suspicion of Penile Fracture
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Muentener M, Suter S, Hauri D, Sulser T
. Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. J Urol. 2004; 172(2):576-9.
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000131594.99785.1c.
View
2.
Barros R, Guimaraes M, Nascimento Jr C, Araujo L, Koifman L, Favorito L
. Penile refracture: a preliminary report. Int Braz J Urol. 2018; 44(4):800-804.
PMC: 6092643.
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0124.
View
3.
Barros R, Silva M, Antonucci V, Schulze L, Koifman L, Favorito L
. Primary urethral reconstruction results in penile fracture. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017; 100(1):21-25.
PMC: 5838661.
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0098.
View
4.
Spiesecke P, Mang J, Fischer T, Hamm B, Lerchbaumer M
. Diagnostic performance of MRI and US in suspicion of penile fracture. Transl Androl Urol. 2022; 11(3):377-385.
PMC: 8984979.
DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-957.
View
5.
Patil B, Kamath S, Patwardhan S, Savalia A
. Importance of time in management of fracture penis: A prospective study. Urol Ann. 2019; 11(4):405-409.
PMC: 6798295.
DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_80_18.
View