» Articles » PMID: 37112378

Longitudinal Gait Analysis of a Transfemoral Amputee Patient: Single-Case Report from Socket-Type to Osseointegrated Prosthesis

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37112378
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present case report was to provide a longitudinal functional assessment of a patient with transfemoral amputation from the preoperative status with socket-type prosthesis to one year after the osseointegration surgery. A 44 years-old male patient was scheduled for osseointegration surgery 17 years after transfemoral amputation. Gait analysis was performed through 15 wearable inertial sensors (MTw Awinda, Xsens) before surgery (patient wearing his standard socket-type prosthesis) and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups after osseointegration. ANOVA in Statistical Parametric Mapping was used to assess the changes in amputee and sound limb hip and pelvis kinematics. The gait symmetry index progressively improved from the pre-op with socket-type (1.14) to the last follow-up (1.04). Step width after osseointegration surgery was half of the pre-op. Hip flexion-extension range significantly improved at follow-ups while frontal and transverse plane rotations decreased ( < 0.001). Pelvis anteversion, obliquity, and rotation also decreased over time ( < 0.001). Spatiotemporal and gait kinematics improved after osseointegration surgery. One year after surgery, symmetry indices were close to non-pathological gait and gait compensation was sensibly decreased. From a functional point of view, osseointegration surgery could be a valid solution in patients with transfemoral amputation facing issues with traditional socket-type prosthesis.

Citing Articles

Lower Extremity Osseointegration Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocols: A Scoping Review.

Grunfeld M, Reif T, Rozbruch S, Hoellwarth J Phys Ther. 2024; 105(1).

PMID: 39385465 PMC: 11783572. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzae139.


Inertial Measuring System to Evaluate Gait Parameters and Dynamic Alignments for Lower-Limb Amputation Subjects.

Han S, Cai M, Pan M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(5).

PMID: 38475055 PMC: 10934525. DOI: 10.3390/s24051519.

References
1.
Lundberg M, Hagberg K, Bullington J . My prosthesis as a part of me: a qualitative analysis of living with an osseointegrated prosthetic limb. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011; 35(2):207-14. DOI: 10.1177/0309364611409795. View

2.
Lombardo F, Maggini M, De Bellis A, Seghieri G, Anichini R . Lower extremity amputations in persons with and without diabetes in Italy: 2001-2010. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e86405. PMC: 3904875. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086405. View

3.
Konig N, Taylor W, Baumann C, Wenderoth N, Singh N . Revealing the quality of movement: A meta-analysis review to quantify the thresholds to pathological variability during standing and walking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 68:111-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.035. View

4.
Harandi V, Ackland D, Haddara R, Lizama L, Graf M, Galea M . Gait compensatory mechanisms in unilateral transfemoral amputees. Med Eng Phys. 2020; 77:95-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.11.006. View

5.
Skiadopoulos A, Moore E, Sayles H, Schmid K, Stergiou N . Step width variability as a discriminator of age-related gait changes. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):41. PMC: 7059259. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00671-9. View