» Articles » PMID: 37111566

From Personalized to Precision Medicine in Oncology: A Model-Based Dosing Approach to Optimize Achievement of Imatinib Target Exposure

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37111566
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Imatinib is a targeted cancer therapy that has significantly improved the care of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, it has been shown that the recommended dosages of imatinib are associated with trough plasma concentration (Cmin) lower than the target value in many patients. The aims of this study were to design a novel model-based dosing approach for imatinib and to compare the performance of this method with that of other dosing methods. Three target interval dosing (TID) methods were developed based on a previously published PK model to optimize the achievement of a target Cmin interval or minimize underexposure. We compared the performance of those methods to that of traditional model-based target concentration dosing (TCD) as well as fixed-dose regimen using simulated patients ( = 800) as well as real patients' data ( = 85). Both TID and TCD model-based approaches were effective with about 65% of Cmin achieving the target imatinib Cmin interval of 1000-2000 ng/mL in 800 simulated patients and more than 75% using real data. The TID approach could also minimize underexposure. The standard 400 mg/24 h dosage of imatinib was associated with only 29% and 16.5% of target attainment in simulated and real conditions, respectively. Some other fixed-dose regimens performed better but could not minimize over- or underexposure. Model-based, goal-oriented methods can improve initial dosing of imatinib. Combined with subsequent TDM, these approaches are a rational basis for precision dosing of imatinib and other drugs with exposure-response relationships in oncology.

Citing Articles

Real-world pharmacokinetics of trametinib in pediatric low-grade glioma.

Pagnot L, Granger I, Guitton J, Favier B, Ceraulo A, Faure-Conter C Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2025; 95(1):35.

PMID: 39998657 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-025-04761-0.


Selecting the Best Pharmacokinetic Models for a Priori Model-Informed Precision Dosing with Model Ensembling.

Agema B, Kocher T, Ozturk A, Giraud E, van Erp N, de Winter B Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024; 63(10):1449-1461.

PMID: 39331236 PMC: 11522197. DOI: 10.1007/s40262-024-01425-9.


Building an adaptive dose simulation framework to aid dose and schedule selection.

Hooijmaijers R, Parasrampuria R, Marostica E, Ferron-Brady G, Post T, Visser S CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023; 12(11):1602-1618.

PMID: 37574587 PMC: 10681481. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13027.

References
1.
Claxton A, Cramer J, Pierce C . A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001; 23(8):1296-310. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80109-0. View

2.
Demetri G, Wang Y, Wehrle E, Racine A, Nikolova Z, Blanke C . Imatinib plasma levels are correlated with clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(19):3141-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4818. View

3.
Joyner M, Paneth N . Seven Questions for Personalized Medicine. JAMA. 2015; 314(10):999-1000. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.7725. View

4.
Zuidema S, Desar I, van Erp N, Kievit W . Optimizing the dose in patients treated with imatinib as first line treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: A cost-effectiveness study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 85(9):1994-2001. PMC: 6710511. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13990. View

5.
Overbeek J, Ter Heine R, Verheul H, Chatelut E, Rudek M, Gurney H . Off-label, but on target: the evidence needed to implement alternative dosing regimens of anticancer drugs. ESMO Open. 2023; 8(1):100749. PMC: 9813708. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100749. View