» Articles » PMID: 37109319

Novel Time-Lapse Parameters Correlate with Embryo Ploidy and Suggest an Improvement in Non-Invasive Embryo Selection

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37109319
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Selecting the best embryo for transfer is key to success in assisted reproduction. The use of algorithms or artificial intelligence can already predict blastulation or implantation with good results. However, ploidy predictions still rely on invasive techniques. Embryologists are still essential, and improving their evaluation tools can enhance clinical outcomes. This study analyzed 374 blastocysts from preimplantation genetic testing cycles. Embryos were cultured in time-lapse incubators and tested for aneuploidies; images were then studied for morphokinetic parameters. We present a new parameter, "st, start of t", detected at the beginning of the first cell cleavage, as strongly implicated in ploidy status. We describe specific cytoplasmic movement patterns associated with ploidy status. Aneuploid embryos also present slower developmental rates (t, t, t, t, cc3, and t-t). Our analysis demonstrates a positive correlation among them for euploid embryos, while aneuploids present non-sequential behaviors. A logistic regression study confirmed the implications of the described parameters, showing a ROC value of 0.69 for ploidy prediction (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62 to 0.76). Our results show that optimizing the relevant indicators to select the most suitable blastocyst, such as by including st, could reduce the time until the pregnancy of a euploid baby while avoiding invasive and expensive methods.

Citing Articles

Time-lapse analysis of embryos classified as euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid after embryonic trophectoderm biopsy.

Listorti I, Pirastu G, Ruberti A, Barberi M, Pristera A, Zazzaro V J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; 42(1):125-138.

PMID: 39832027 PMC: 11806175. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03364-7.


CRISPR/Cas9-editing of PRNP in Alpine goats.

Allais-Bonnet A, Richard C, Andre M, Gelin V, Deloche M, Lamadon A Vet Res. 2025; 56(1):11.

PMID: 39806509 PMC: 11731167. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-024-01444-1.


Preimplantation development analysis of aneuploid embryos with different chromosomal abnormalities.

Si K, Ma B, Bai J, Wu L, He H, Jin L Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40686.

PMID: 39687119 PMC: 11647804. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40686.


Correlation between Human Embryo Morphokinetics Observed through Time-Lapse Incubator and Life Birth Rate.

Maghiar L, Naghi P, Zaha I, Sandor M, Bodog A, Sachelarie L J Pers Med. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452552 PMC: 11508429. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14101045.


The severity of meiotic aneuploidy is associated with altered morphokinetic variables of mouse oocyte maturation.

Zhu Y, Kratka C, Pea J, Lee H, Kratka C, Xu J Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(2):hoae023.

PMID: 38764910 PMC: 11099657. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae023.


References
1.
Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Alexander S . Differential mitochondrial distribution in human pronuclear embryos leads to disproportionate inheritance between blastomeres: relationship to microtubular organization, ATP content and competence. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15(12):2621-33. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2621. View

2.
Munne S . Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006; 12(2):234-53. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60866-8. View

3.
Yang H, Yang Q, Dai S, Li G, Jin H, Yao G . Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(7):865-72. PMC: 4930781. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0712-6. View

4.
Gardner D, Schoolcraft W . Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 11(3):307-11. DOI: 10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013. View

5.
Dayan N, Joseph K, Fell D, Laskin C, Basso O, Park A . Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score-matched cohort study. CMAJ. 2019; 191(5):E118-E127. PMC: 6351248. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.181124. View