» Articles » PMID: 37107000

Discovery of Novel Resistance Mechanisms of Biofilm Against Aminoglycoside Antibiotics

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37107000
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inappropriate use of antibiotics eventually leads to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains and invalidates the treatment of infectious diseases. Aminoglycoside antibiotics (AGAs) are a class of broad-spectrum cationic antibiotics widely used for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections. Understanding the AGA resistance mechanism of bacteria would increase the efficacy of treating these infections. This study demonstrates a significant correlation between AGA resistance and the adaptation of biofilms by (VP). These adaptations were the result of challenges against the aminoglycosides (amikacin and gentamicin). Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) analysis revealed an enclosure type mechanism where the biological volume (BV) and average thickness (AT) of biofilm were significantly positively correlated with amikacin resistance (BIC) ( < 0.01). A neutralization type mechanism was mediated by anionic extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs). The biofilm minimum inhibitory concentrations of amikacin and gentamicin were reduced from 32 µg/mL to 16 µg/mL and from 16 µg/mL to 4 µg/mL, respectively, after anionic EPS treatment with DNase I and proteinase K. Here, anionic EPSs bind cationic AGAs to develop antibiotic resistance. Transcriptomic sequencing revealed a regulatory type mechanism, where antibiotic resistance associated genes were significantly upregulated in biofilm producing when compared with planktonic cells. The three mechanistic strategies of developing resistance demonstrate that selective and judicious use of new antibiotics are needed to win the battle against infectious disease.

Citing Articles

Biofilm Resilience: Molecular Mechanisms Driving Antibiotic Resistance in Clinical Contexts.

Almatroudi A Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001933 PMC: 11852148. DOI: 10.3390/biology14020165.


Pathogenic Bacteria in Free-Living Birds, and Its Public Health Significance.

Kobuszewska A, Wysok B Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38540066 PMC: 10967383. DOI: 10.3390/ani14060968.


Prevalence, multidrug resistance, and biofilm formation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from fish mariculture environments in Cat Ba Island, Vietnam.

Nguyen K, Truong P, Thi H, Ho X, Van Nguyen P Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2024; 15(1):56-67.

PMID: 38481050 PMC: 10982652. DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0181.


Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Biomaterials and Approaches to Its Treatment and Prevention.

Li P, Yin R, Cheng J, Lin J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(14).

PMID: 37511440 PMC: 10380251. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411680.

References
1.
Shukla S, Rao T . Dispersal of Bap-mediated Staphylococcus aureus biofilm by proteinase K. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2012; 66(2):55-60. DOI: 10.1038/ja.2012.98. View

2.
Secchi E, Savorana G, Vitale A, Eberl L, Stocker R, Rusconi R . The structural role of bacterial eDNA in the formation of biofilm streamers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(12):e2113723119. PMC: 8944759. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2113723119. View

3.
Yamaguchi-Kuroda Y, Kikuchi Y, Kokubu E, Ishihara K . diffusible signaling molecules enhance biofilm formation gene expression modulation. J Oral Microbiol. 2023; 15(1):2165001. PMC: 9848294. DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2023.2165001. View

4.
Chen C, Liao X, Jiang H, Zhu H, Yue L, Li S . Characteristics of Escherichia coli biofilm production, genetic typing, drug resistance pattern and gene expression under aminoglycoside pressures. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011; 30(1):5-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2010.03.004. View

5.
Fauzia K, Miftahussurur M, Syam A, Waskito L, Doohan D, Rezkitha Y . Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotype of Clinical Isolates. Toxins (Basel). 2020; 12(8). PMC: 7472329. DOI: 10.3390/toxins12080473. View