» Articles » PMID: 37106974

Social Box: A New Housing System Increases Social Interactions Among Stallions

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37106974
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In domestic conditions, adult stallions are mostly housed individually in internal stables to reduce the risk of injuries during social interactions. Social deprivation in horses results in physiological stress and behavioural problems. The aim of this study was to test the "social box" (SB), which allows closer physical contact between neighbouring horses. Eight pairs of stallions (n = 16) were filmed over a 24 h period in the SB and in their usual box stables, "conventional boxes" (CB), which strongly restrict tactile contact. The effect of housing in the SB on behaviour and the occurrence and characteristics of injuries was investigated. The total duration of active social interactions was significantly higher in the SB than in the CB (51.1 vs. 4.9 min, < 0.0001). Positive interactions accounted for about 71% of the total duration of interactions in SB and CB stabling. The stallions interacted significantly more often in the SB than in the CB (113.5 vs. 23.8 social interaction sequences over 24 h, < 0.0001). No grievous injuries were recorded. The social box appears to be a suitable solution to give adult stallions the possibility of having physical interactions. Therefore, it can be considered a substantial environmental enrichment for singly housed horses.

Citing Articles

Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses.

Phelipon R, Hennes N, Ruet A, Bret-Morel A, Gorecka-Bruzda A, Lansade L Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1504116.

PMID: 39634765 PMC: 11615640. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116.


Social Box: Influence of a New Housing System on the Social Interactions of Stallions When Driven in Pairs.

Gmel A, Zollinger A, Wyss C, Bachmann I, Briefer Freymond S Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 35565503 PMC: 9099530. DOI: 10.3390/ani12091077.

References
1.
Mellor D . Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living". Animals (Basel). 2016; 6(3). PMC: 4810049. DOI: 10.3390/ani6030021. View

2.
McDonnell S . Practical review of self-mutilation in horses. Anim Reprod Sci. 2008; 107(3-4):219-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.012. View

3.
Hartmann E, Boe K, Christensen J, Hyyppa S, Jansson H, Jorgensen G . A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(9):4564-74. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9233. View

4.
Feh . Alliances and reproductive success in Camargue stallions. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(3):705-713. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1009. View

5.
Ruet A, Lemarchand J, Parias C, Mach N, Moisan M, Foury A . Housing Horses in Individual Boxes Is a Challenge with Regard to Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(9). PMC: 6770668. DOI: 10.3390/ani9090621. View