Assessment of the Relationship Between the Total Occlusal Area of the Human Permanent Upper First and Second Molars and the Robusticity of the Facial Skeleton in Sex-Different Cranial Samples of Homo Sapiens: A Preliminary Study

Overview

Journal Biology (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Specialty Biology

Date 2023 Apr 28

PMID 37106765

Authors

Wioletta Nowaczewska

Katarzyna Gorka

Agata Cieslik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish whether there is a significant relationship between the total occlusal area (TOCA) of two types of permanent upper molars (first-M and second-M) and facial robusticity, as well as which of the examined facial regions indicate a relationship concerning the grade of their massiveness with the TOCA of analyzed molars in different sex adult cranial samples. To obtain the values of the TOCA of the molars (n = 145), a morphometric method was performed based on the calibrated digital images of their occlusal surface using ImageJ software. The grades of the massiveness of six facial regions were assessed using qualitative scales of their expression, and an index of general facial robusticity was calculated. Two types of analyses were performed concerning standardized and non-standardized traits to the facial size, including Spearman's/or Pearson's correlations and partial rank correlations. The obtained results indicated the presence of a positive relationship between the relative TOCA of Ms and the relative general facial robusticity, as well as between the TOCA of both types of molars and the massiveness of trigone region of the facial skeleton in male crania. However, most of the obtained results were not consistent with the assumptions of the "localized masticatory stress hypothesis".

References

von Cramon-Taubadel N . Evolutionary insights into global patterns of human cranial diversity: population history, climatic and dietary effects. J Anthropol Sci. 2013; 92:43-77. DOI: 10.4436/jass.91010. View

Garvin H, Ruff C . Sexual dimorphism in skeletal browridge and chin morphologies determined using a new quantitative method. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012; 147(4):661-70. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22036. View

Humphrey L . Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998; 105(1):57-72. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-A. View

Smith B . Development and evolution of the helicoidal plane of dental occlusion. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986; 69(1):21-35. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330690105. View

Dempsey P, Townsend G . Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in human tooth size. Heredity (Edinb). 2001; 86(Pt 6):685-93. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00878.x. View

Cheverud J . PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN THE CRANIUM. Evolution. 2017; 36(3):499-516. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05070.x. View

Reyes-Centeno H, Ghirotto S, Harvati K . Genomic validation of the differential preservation of population history in modern human cranial anatomy. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2016; 162(1):170-179. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23060. View

Janovic A, Saveljic I, Vukicevic A, Nikolic D, Rakocevic Z, Jovicic G . Occlusal load distribution through the cortical and trabecular bone of the human mid-facial skeleton in natural dentition: a three-dimensional finite element study. Ann Anat. 2014; 197:16-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2014.09.002. View

Senator M, Kwiatkowska B, Gronkiewicz S . Height of skull base as an indicator of living conditions in historical native populations from Europe, Australia and Africa. Homo. 2009; 60(6):535-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.003. View

10.

Edmonds H, Glowacka H . The ontogeny of maximum bite force in humans. J Anat. 2020; 237(3):529-542. PMC: 7476206. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13218. View

11.

Noback M, Harvati K . The contribution of subsistence to global human cranial variation. J Hum Evol. 2015; 80:34-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.11.005. View

12.

Nowaczewska W, Kuzminski L, Biecek P . Morphological relationship between the cranial and supraorbital regions in Homo sapiens. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014; 156(1):110-24. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22632. View

13.

Perlaza N . Sex determination from the frontal bone: a geometric morphometric study. J Forensic Sci. 2014; 59(5):1330-2. DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12467. View

14.

Gross M, Arbel G, Hershkovitz I . Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the facial skeleton on simulated occlusal loading. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28(7):684-94. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00711.x. View

15.

Kaifu Y . Changes in the pattern of tooth wear from prehistoric to recent periods in Japan. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1999; 109(4):485-99. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199908)109:4<485::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-K. View

16.

Rosas A, Bastir M . Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002; 117(3):236-45. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10023. View

17.

Molnar P . Dental wear and oral pathology: possible evidence and consequences of habitual use of teeth in a Swedish Neolithic sample. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008; 136(4):423-31. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20824. View

18.

Gorka K, Romero A, Perez-Perez A . First molar size and wear within and among modern hunter-gatherers and agricultural populations. Homo. 2015; 66(4):299-315. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2015.02.007. View

19.

Littleton J, Scott R, McFarlane G, Walshe K . Hunter-gatherer variability: Dental wear in South Australia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013; 152(2):273-86. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22358. View

20.

Ledogar J, Dechow P, Wang Q, Gharpure P, Gordon A, Baab K . Human feeding biomechanics: performance, variation, and functional constraints. PeerJ. 2016; 4:e2242. PMC: 4975005. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2242. View