» Articles » PMID: 37104351

Predominance of Multidrug Resistant of Environmental Phylotype in Different Environments of Dhaka, Bangladesh

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 27
PMID 37104351
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Considering the ecological diversity of , the main aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, phylogroup diversity, and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated from 383 different clinical and environmental sources. In total, varied prevalence was observed of the 197 confirmed that were isolated (human-100%, animal-67.5%, prawn-49.23%, soil-30.58%, and water-27.88%). Of these isolates, 70 (36%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR). MDR was significantly associated with their sources (χ = 29.853, = 0.001). Humans (51.67%) and animals (51.85%) carried more MDR than other environments. The gene indicative of recent fecal contamination was not detected in any isolate, indicating that these isolates could be present in these environments for a long time and became naturalized. Phylogroup B1 (48.22%) was the predominant group, being present in all hosts analyzed and with the commensal group A (26.9%) representing the second predominant group. According to chi-square analysis, phylogroup B1 was significantly associated with from humans ( = 0.024), soil ( < 0.001) and prawn samples ( < 0.001). Human samples were significantly associated with phylogroup B1 ( = 0.024), D ( < 0.001), and F ( = 0.016) of strains, whereas phylogroup A ( < 0.001), C ( < 0.001), and E ( = 0.015) were associated with animal samples. Correspondence analysis results also indicated the association of these phylogroups with their hosts/sources. The findings of this study exhibited a non-random distribution of phylogenetic groups, though the diversity index was highest for human phylogroups.

Citing Articles

Molecular Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant from Fecal Samples of Wild Animals.

Sabenca C, Romero-Rivera M, Barbero-Herranz R, Sargo R, Sousa L, Silva F Vet Sci. 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39453061 PMC: 11512376. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11100469.


Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Risk Factors Associated with ESBL-Producing and MDR in Hospital and Environmental Settings in Lusaka, Zambia: Implications for One Health, Antimicrobial Stewardship and Surveillance Systems.

Kasanga M, Kwenda G, Wu J, Kasanga M, Mwikisa M, Chanda R Microorganisms. 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37630511 PMC: 10459584. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11081951.

References
1.
Montealegre M, Roy S, Boni F, Hossain M, Navab-Daneshmand T, Caduff L . Risk Factors for Detection, Survival, and Growth of Antibiotic-Resistant and Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Household Soils in Rural Bangladesh. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018; 84(24). PMC: 6275341. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01978-18. View

2.
Clermont O, Christenson J, Denamur E, Gordon D . The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013; 5(1):58-65. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12019. View

3.
Byappanahalli M, Whitman R, Shively D, Sadowsky M, Ishii S . Population structure, persistence, and seasonality of autochthonous Escherichia coli in temperate, coastal forest soil from a Great Lakes watershed. Environ Microbiol. 2006; 8(3):504-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00916.x. View

4.
Escobar-Paramo P, Grenet K, Menach A, Rode L, Salgado E, Amorin C . Large-scale population structure of human commensal Escherichia coli isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(9):5698-700. PMC: 520916. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5698-5700.2004. View

5.
Escobar-Paramo P, Menach A, Le Gall T, Amorin C, Gouriou S, Picard B . Identification of forces shaping the commensal Escherichia coli genetic structure by comparing animal and human isolates. Environ Microbiol. 2006; 8(11):1975-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01077.x. View