An Exploratory Study on the Impacts of Individual Skills and Health Information Exposure on Perceptions of Cancer Control and Expert Competence

Overview

Journal J Cancer Educ

Publisher Springer

Specialties Medical Education
Oncology

Date 2023 Apr 27

PMID 37103679

Authors

Catherine E Slavik

Niko Yiannakoulias

Robert Wilton

Fran Scott

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

People's perceptions of control over their risk of cancer, and their perceptions of health experts' abilities to manage cancer risks, shape their beliefs about the effectiveness of expert-recommended cancer-preventive behaviors and actions. The aims of this exploratory study were to investigate the impact of individual skills and sources of health information on (i) internal locus of cancer control (ILOC) and (ii) perceived expert competence. Using a cross-sectional survey (n = 172), we collected data on individual health expertise, numeracy, health literacy, amounts of health information received from various sources, ILOC for cancer prevention and perceived expert competence (i.e., believing that health experts have the knowledge to correctly estimate cancer risks). Significant associations between health expertise and ILOC, and between health literacy and ILOC, were not observed in this study (OR = 2.15, 95%CI = 0.96-5.98; OR = 1.78, 95%CI = 0.97-3.63, respectively). Participants who received more health information from the news were more likely to perceive experts as competent (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.06-3.57). Logistic regression analyses suggested that higher levels of health literacy among individuals with lower numeracy may promote ILOC but discourage expert competence beliefs. Analyses by gender suggested females with low educational attainment and lower numeracy may especially benefit from educational interventions to improve health literacy and promote ILOC. Our findings build off existing literature that point to a possible interaction between numeracy and health literacy. This research, with follow up work, may have practical implications for health educators aiming to promote specific cancer beliefs that lead to the uptake of expert-recommended cancer-preventive behaviors.

References

Weinstein N . The precaution adoption process. Health Psychol. 1988; 7(4):355-86. DOI: 10.1037//0278-6133.7.4.355. View

Dopelt K, Bashkin O, Asna N, Davidovitch N . Health locus of control in cancer patient and oncologist decision-making: An exploratory qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0263086. PMC: 8794183. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263086. View

Nafradi L, Nakamoto K, Schulz P . Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186458. PMC: 5645121. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186458. View

Park C, Cho D, Moore P . How does education lead to healthier behaviours? Testing the mediational roles of perceived control, health literacy and social support. Psychol Health. 2018; 33(11):1416-1429. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1510932. View

Chen Y, Feeley T . Numeracy, information seeking, and self-efficacy in managing health: an analysis using the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Health Commun. 2013; 29(9):843-53. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2013.807904. View

Kobayashi L, Smith S . Cancer Fatalism, Literacy, and Cancer Information Seeking in the American Public. Health Educ Behav. 2015; 43(4):461-70. PMC: 5123630. DOI: 10.1177/1090198115604616. View

Morris N, Field T, Wagner J, Cutrona S, Roblin D, Gaglio B . The association between health literacy and cancer-related attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge. J Health Commun. 2013; 18 Suppl 1:223-41. PMC: 3815140. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.825667. View

Dieckmann N, Peters E, Gregory R . At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges. Risk Anal. 2015; 35(7):1281-95. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12358. View

Nouri S, Damschroder L, Olsen M, Gierisch J, Fagerlin A, Sanders L . Health Coaching Has Differential Effects on Veterans with Limited Health Literacy and Numeracy: a Secondary Analysis of ACTIVATE. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(4):552-558. PMC: 6445901. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04861-7. View

10.

Portnoy D, Roter D, Erby L . The role of numeracy on client knowledge in BRCA genetic counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 81(1):131-6. PMC: 2891310. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.036. View

11.

HOLT C, Clark E, Kreuter M, Scharff D . Does locus of control moderate the effects of tailored health education materials?. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15(4):393-403. DOI: 10.1093/her/15.4.393. View

12.

Dixon G, Clarke C . The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Educ Res. 2012; 28(2):352-9. DOI: 10.1093/her/cys110. View

13.

Niederdeppe J, Lee T, Robbins R, Kim H, Kresovich A, Kirshenblat D . Content and effects of news stories about uncertain cancer causes and preventive behaviors. Health Commun. 2013; 29(4):332-46. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2012.755603. View

14.

Schwartz L, Woloshin S, Black W, Welch H . The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127(11):966-72. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003. View

15.

Woloshin S, Schwartz L, Welch H . Patients and medical statistics. Interest, confidence, and ability. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(11):996-1000. PMC: 1490265. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.00179.x. View

16.

Kiechle E, Bailey S, Hedlund L, Viera A, Sheridan S . Different Measures, Different Outcomes? A Systematic Review of Performance-Based versus Self-Reported Measures of Health Literacy and Numeracy. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30(10):1538-46. PMC: 4579206. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3288-4. View

17.

Welch J, Ellis E . Sex Differences in the Association of Perceived Ambiguity, Cancer Fatalism, and Health-Related Self-Efficacy with Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. J Health Commun. 2018; 23(12):984-992. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1534905. View

18.

Peters E . Numeracy and the perception and communication of risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1128:1-7. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1399.001. View