» Articles » PMID: 37098987

Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Central Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Central blood pressure (cBP) is considered an independent predictor of organ damage, cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Evidence has shown that high intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and vascular function. However, the effects of these aerobic training modalities on cBP have not yet been properly reviewed.This meta-analysis aims to investigate to effects of HIIT versus MICT on cBP.We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared HIIT versus MICT on cBP. Primary outcomes were measures of central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and central diastolic blood pressure (cDBP). Peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (pDBP), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were analyzed as second outcomes. Meta-analysis of mean differences (MD) was conducted using the random effects model.Our study included 163 patients enrolled in six trials. We found that HIIT was superior to MICT in reducing the cSBP (MD = -3.12 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.75 to -1.50, p = 0.0002) and SBP (MD = -2.67 mmHg, 95% CI: -5.18 to -0.16, p = 0.04), and increasing VO2max(MD = 2.49 mL/kg/min, 95% CI: 1.25 to 3.73, p = 0.001). However, no significant differences were reported for cDBP, DBP and PWV.HIIT was superior to MICT in reducing the cSBP, which suggests its potential role as a non-pharmacological therapy for high blood pressure.

References
1.
Ramos J, Dalleck L, Tjonna A, Beetham K, Coombes J . The impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015; 45(5):679-92. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-015-0321-z. View

2.
Williams B, Lacy P, Thom S, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D . Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation. 2006; 113(9):1213-25. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595496. View

3.
Boutouyrie P, Bruno R . The Clinical Significance and Application of Vascular Stiffness Measurements. Am J Hypertens. 2018; 32(1):4-11. DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpy145. View

4.
Cassidy S, Thoma C, Houghton D, Trenell M . High-intensity interval training: a review of its impact on glucose control and cardiometabolic health. Diabetologia. 2016; 60(1):7-23. PMC: 6518096. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-016-4106-1. View

5.
Toohey K, Pumpa K, Arnolda L, Cooke J, Yip D, Craft P . A pilot study examining the effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training and continuous low to moderate intensity training on quality of life, functional capacity and cardiovascular risk factors in cancer survivors. PeerJ. 2016; 4:e2613. PMC: 5075690. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2613. View