Low Back Pain of Disc, Sacroiliac Joint, or Facet Joint Origin: a Diagnostic Accuracy Systematic Review

Overview

Journal EClinicalMedicine

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Apr 25

PMID 37096189

Authors

Christopher S Han

Mark J Hancock

Sweekriti Sharma

Saurab Sharma

Ian A Harris

Steven P Cohen

John Magnussen

Chris G Maher

Adrian C Traeger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The accuracy of diagnostic tests available in primary care to identify the disc, sacroiliac joint, and facet joint as the source of low back pain is uncertain.

Methods: Systematic review of diagnostic tests available in primary care. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched between March 2006 and 25th January 2023. Pairs of reviewers independently screened all studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. Pooling was performed for homogenous studies. Positive likelihood ratios (+LR) ≥2 and negative likelihood ratios (-LR) ≤0.5 were considered informative. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020169828).

Findings: We included 62 studies: 35 investigated the disc, 14 the facet joint, 11 the sacroiliac joint, and 2 investigated all three structures in patients with persistent low back pain. For risk of bias, the domain 'reference standard' scored worst, however approximately half the studies were of low risk of bias for every other domain. For the disc, pooling demonstrated MRI findings of disc degeneration and annular fissure resulted in informative +LRs: 2.53 (95% CI: 1.57-4.07) and 2.88 (95% CI: 2.02-4.10) and -LRs: 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.24) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.10-0.55) respectively. Pooled results for Modic type 1, Modic type 2, and HIZ on MRI, and centralisation phenomenon yielded informative +LRs: 10.00 (95% CI: 4.20-23.82), 8.03 (95% CI: 3.23-19.97), 3.10 (95% CI: 2.27-4.25), and 3.06 (95% CI: 1.44-6.50) respectively, but uninformative -LRs: 0.84 (95% CI: 0.74-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96), 0.61 (95% CI: 0.48-0.77), and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.52-0.84) respectively. For the facet joint, pooling demonstrated facet joint uptake on SPECT resulted in informative +LRs: 2.80 (95% CI: 1.82-4.31) and -LRs: 0.44 (95% CI: 0.25-0.77). For the sacroiliac joint, a combination of pain provocation tests and absence of midline low back pain resulted in informative +LRs of 2.41 (95% CI: 1.89-3.07) and 2.44 (95% CI: 1.50-3.98) and -LRs of 0.35 (95% CI: 0.12-1.01) and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.21-0.47) respectively. Radionuclide imaging yielded an informative +LR 7.33 (95% CI: 1.42-37.80) but an uninformative -LR 0.74 (95% CI: 0.41-1.34).

Interpretation: There are informative diagnostic tests for the disc, sacroiliac joint, and facet joint (only one test). The evidence suggests a diagnosis may be possible for some patients with low back pain, potentially guiding targeted and specific treatment approaches.

Funding: There was no funding for this study.

Citing Articles

Intervertebral Disc Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Changes After Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Lumbar Discogenic Pain.

Billham J, Shi D, Evans Roland E, Gornet M, Brinkman K, Schranck F Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72225.

PMID: 39583519 PMC: 11584172. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72225.

The clinical significance of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a novel inflammatory biomarker for assessing the severity of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Guo K, Zeng J, Lu J, Guo Y, Shan P, Huang Y Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1446124.

PMID: 39544385 PMC: 11560784. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1446124.

Exercises for the prevention of non-specific low back pain.

Scaff S, Hancock M, Munhoz T, Maher C, Saragiotto B Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 7:CD014146.

PMID: 39041371 PMC: 11264324. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014146.

Bacterial growth in patients with low back pain and Modic changes: protocol of a multicentre, case-control biopsy study.

Rolfsen M, Gammelsrud K, Espeland A, Braten L, Mjones S, Austevoll I BMJ Open. 2024; 14(5):e082244.

PMID: 38719329 PMC: 11086543. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082244.

Associations between Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Structures and Pain Distribution in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Kojima S, Ikemoto T, Arai Y, Hirasawa A, Deie M, Takahashi N Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(16).

PMID: 37628552 PMC: 10454018. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162357.

References

Yrjama M, Tervonen O, Vanharanta H . Ultrasonic imaging of lumbar discs combined with vibration pain provocation compared with discography in the diagnosis of internal anular fissures of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(5):571-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199603010-00007. View

Donelson R, Aprill C, Medcalf R, Grant W . A prospective study of centralization of lumbar and referred pain. A predictor of symptomatic discs and anular competence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(10):1115-22. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705150-00011. View

Dionne C, Dunn K, Croft P, Nachemson A, Buchbinder R, Walker B . A consensus approach toward the standardization of back pain definitions for use in prevalence studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(1):95-103. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e7f94. View

Nejati P, Sartaj E, Imani F, Moeineddin R, Nejati L, Safavi M . Accuracy of the Diagnostic Tests of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. J Chiropr Med. 2020; 19(1):28-37. PMC: 7646135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2019.12.002. View

Mekhail N, Saweris Y, Sue Mehanny D, Makarova N, Guirguis M, Costandi S . Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Predictive Value of Three Diagnostic Clinical Tests. Pain Pract. 2020; 21(2):204-214. DOI: 10.1111/papr.12950. View

Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss D, Aprill C . Vibration pain provocation can improve the specificity of MRI in the diagnosis of symptomatic lumbar disc rupture. Clin J Pain. 1998; 14(3):239-47. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199809000-00011. View

Hebelka H, Hanna H, Hansson T, Tommy H . HIZ's relation to axial load and low back pain: investigated with axial loaded MRI and pressure controlled discography. Eur Spine J. 2012; 22(4):734-9. PMC: 3631029. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2501-y. View

Revel M, Listrat V, Chevalier X, Dougados M, Nguyen M, Vallee C . Facet joint block for low back pain: identifying predictors of a good response. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992; 73(9):824-8. View

Stanford G, Burnham R . Is it useful to repeat sacroiliac joint provocative tests post-block?. Pain Med. 2010; 11(12):1774-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00968.x. View

10.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9, W64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. View

11.

Laslett M, Aprill C, McDonald B, Young S . Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005; 10(3):207-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2005.01.003. View

12.

Petersen T, Laslett M, Juhl C . Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):188. PMC: 5429540. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6. View

13.

Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C . The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014; 73(6):968-74. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. View

14.

Laslett M, McDonald B, Aprill C, Tropp H, Oberg B . Clinical predictors of screening lumbar zygapophyseal joint blocks: development of clinical prediction rules. Spine J. 2006; 6(4):370-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.004. View

15.

Saueressig T, Owen P, Diemer F, Zebisch J, Belavy D . Diagnostic Accuracy of Clusters of Pain Provocation Tests for Detecting Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021; 51(9):422-431. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2021.10469. View

16.

Hancock M, Maher C, Latimer J, Spindler M, McAuley J, Laslett M . Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(10):1539-50. PMC: 2078309. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0391-1. View

17.

Ohnmeiss D, Vanharanta H, Ekholm J . Relationship of pain drawings to invasive tests assessing intervertebral disc pathology. Eur Spine J. 1999; 8(2):126-31. PMC: 3611154. DOI: 10.1007/s005860050141. View

18.

Jacobs J, Jarvik J, Chou R, Boothroyd D, Lo J, Nevedal A . Observational Study of the Downstream Consequences of Inappropriate MRI of the Lumbar Spine. J Gen Intern Med. 2020; 35(12):3605-3612. PMC: 7728897. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06181-7. View

19.

Knezevic N, Candido K, Vlaeyen J, Van Zundert J, Cohen S . Low back pain. Lancet. 2021; 398(10294):78-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. View

20.

DePalma M, Ketchum J, Trussell B, Saullo T, Slipman C . Does the location of low back pain predict its source?. PM R. 2011; 3(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.09.006. View