» Articles » PMID: 37095077

In Silico Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Uncover the Consequences of Therapy-specific Response Patterns for Clinical Trial Design and Outcome

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37095077
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Late-stage cancer immunotherapy trials often lead to unusual survival curve shapes, like delayed curve separation or a plateauing curve in the treatment arm. It is critical for trial success to anticipate such effects in advance and adjust the design accordingly. Here, we use in silico cancer immunotherapy trials - simulated trials based on three different mathematical models - to assemble virtual patient cohorts undergoing late-stage immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or combination therapies. We find that all three simulation models predict the distinctive survival curve shapes commonly associated with immunotherapies. Considering four aspects of clinical trial design - sample size, endpoint, randomization rate, and interim analyses - we demonstrate how, by simulating various possible scenarios, the robustness of trial design choices can be scrutinized, and possible pitfalls can be identified in advance. We provide readily usable, web-based implementations of our three trial simulation models to facilitate their use by biomedical researchers, doctors, and trialists.

Citing Articles

Phytochemical synergies in BK002: advanced molecular docking insights for targeted prostate cancer therapy.

Park M, Choi J, Maharub Hossain Fahim M, Asevedo E, Nurkolis F, Ribeiro R Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1504618.

PMID: 40034825 PMC: 11872924. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1504618.


Harnessing the AI/ML in Drug and Biological Products Discovery and Development: The Regulatory Perspective.

Mirakhori F, Niazi S Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 18(1).

PMID: 39861110 PMC: 11769376. DOI: 10.3390/ph18010047.


The PERMIT guidelines for designing and implementing all stages of personalised medicine research.

Garcia P, Banzi R, Fosse V, Gerardi C, Glaab E, Haro J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27894.

PMID: 39537728 PMC: 11560950. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79161-0.


Virtual patient analysis identifies strategies to improve the performance of predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade.

Arulraj T, Wang H, Deshpande A, Varadhan R, Emens L, Jaffee E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(45):e2410911121.

PMID: 39467131 PMC: 11551325. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410911121.


Critical Appraisal and Future Challenges of Artificial Intelligence and Anticancer Drug Development.

Chamorey E, Gal J, Mograbi B, Milano G Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(7).

PMID: 39065667 PMC: 11279680. DOI: 10.3390/ph17070816.


References
1.
Tsur N, Kogan Y, Rehm M, Agur Z . Response of patients with melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade - insights gleaned from analysis of a new mathematical mechanistic model. J Theor Biol. 2019; 485:110033. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110033. View

2.
Agur Z, Halevi-Tobias K, Kogan Y, Shlagman O . Employing dynamical computational models for personalizing cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2016; 16(11):1373-1385. DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2016.1223622. View

3.
Patel S, Kurzrock R . PD-L1 Expression as a Predictive Biomarker in Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015; 14(4):847-56. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0983. View

4.
Brown L, Gaffney E, Wagg J, Coles M . Applications of mechanistic modelling to clinical and experimental immunology: an emerging technology to accelerate immunotherapeutic discovery and development. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018; 193(3):284-292. PMC: 6150250. DOI: 10.1111/cei.13182. View

5.
Doostfatemeh M, Taghi Ayatollah S, Jafari P . Power and Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Trials with Patient-Reported Outcomes under Equal and Unequal Group Sizes Based on Graded Response Model: A Simulation Study. Value Health. 2016; 19(5):639-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1857. View