» Articles » PMID: 37094897

Medical Use and Combination Drug Therapy Among US Adult Users of Central Nervous System Stimulants: a Cross-sectional Analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37094897
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Examine patterns of adult medical use of amphetamine and methylphenidate stimulant drugs, classified in the USA as Schedule II controlled substances with a high potential for psychological or physical dependence.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting And Participants: Prescription drug claims for US adults, age 19-64 years, included in a commercial insurance claims database with 9.1 million continuously enrolled adults from 1 October 2019, through 31 December 2020. Stimulant use was defined as adults filling one or more stimulant prescriptions during calendar 2020.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was an outpatient prescription claim, service date and days' supply for central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Combination-2 was defined as 60 days or more of combination treatment with a Schedule II stimulant and one or more additional CNS-active drugs. Combination-3 therapy was defined as the addition of 2 or more additional CNS-active drugs. Using service date and days' supply, we examined the number of stimulant and other CNS-active drugs for each of the 366 days of 2020.

Results: Among 9 141 877 continuously enrolled adults, the study identified 276 223 individuals (3.0%) using Schedule II stimulants during 2020. They filled a median of 8 (IQR, 4-11) prescriptions for these stimulant drugs that provided 227 (IQR, 110-322) treatment days of exposure. Among this group, 125 781 (45.5%) combined use of one or more additional CNS active drugs for a median of 213 (IQR, 126-301) treatment days. Also, 66 996 (24.3%) stimulant users used two or more additional CNS-active drugs for a median of 182 (IQR, 108-276) days. Among stimulants users, 131 485 (47.6%) were exposed to an antidepressant, 85 166 (30.8%) filled prescriptions for anxiety/sedative/hypnotic medications and 54 035 (19.6%) received opioid prescriptions.

Conclusion: A large proportion of adults using Schedule II stimulants are simultaneously exposed to one or more other CNS-active drugs, many with tolerance, withdrawal effects or potential for non-medical use. There are no approved indications and limited clinical trial testing of these multi-drug combinations, and discontinuation may be challenging.

References
1.
Moore T, Wirtz P, Kruszewski S, Alexander G . Changes in medical use of central nervous system stimulants among US adults, 2013 and 2018: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8):e048528. PMC: 8365816. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048528. View

2.
Rasmussen N . America's first amphetamine epidemic 1929-1971: a quantitative and qualitative retrospective with implications for the present. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(6):974-85. PMC: 2377281. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.110593. View

3.
Fleckenstein A, Volz T, Riddle E, Gibb J, Hanson G . New insights into the mechanism of action of amphetamines. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007; 47:681-98. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105140. View

4.
Board A, Guy G, Jones C, Hoots B . Trends in stimulant dispensing by age, sex, state of residence, and prescriber specialty - United States, 2014-2019. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 217:108297. PMC: 7851748. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108297. View

5.
Brumbaugh S, Tuan W, Scott A, Latronica J, Bone C . Trends in characteristics of the recipients of new prescription stimulants between years 2010 and 2020 in the United States: An observational cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 50:101524. PMC: 9257326. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101524. View