» Articles » PMID: 37093914

An Intelligent Method for Pregnancy Diagnosis in Breeding Sows According to Ultrasonography Algorithms

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37093914
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pig breeding management directly contributes to the profitability of pig farms, and pregnancy diagnosis is an important factor in breeding management. Therefore, the need to diagnose pregnancy in sows is emphasized, and various studies have been conducted in this area. We propose a computer-aided diagnosis system to assist livestock farmers to diagnose sow pregnancy through ultrasound. Methods for diagnosing pregnancy in sows through ultrasound include the Doppler method, which measures the heart rate and pulse status, and the echo method, which diagnoses by amplitude depth technique. We propose a method that uses deep learning algorithms on ultrasonography, which is part of the echo method. As deep learning-based classification algorithms, Inception-v4, Xception, and EfficientNetV2 were used and compared to find the optimal algorithm for pregnancy diagnosis in sows. Gaussian and speckle noises were added to the ultrasound images according to the characteristics of the ultrasonography, which is easily affected by noise from the surrounding environments. Both the original and noise added ultrasound images of sows were tested together to determine the suitability of the proposed method on farms. The pregnancy diagnosis performance on the original ultrasound images achieved 0.99 in accuracy in the highest case and on the ultrasound images with noises, the performance achieved 0.98 in accuracy. The diagnosis performance achieved 0.96 in accuracy even when the intensity of noise was strong, proving its robustness against noise.

Citing Articles

Metabolomics reveals early pregnancy biomarkers in sows: a non-invasive diagnostic approach.

Ren Y, Zhang Q, He F, Qi M, Fu B, Zhang H Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1396492.

PMID: 38725582 PMC: 11079122. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1396492.

References
1.
Tajudeen H, Moturi J, Hosseindoust A, Ha S, Mun J, Choi Y . Effects of various cooling methods and drinking water temperatures on reproductive performance and behavior in heat stressed sows. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022; 64(4):782-791. PMC: 9353355. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2022.e33. View

2.
Lee S, Hosseindoust A, Choi Y, Kim M, Kim K, Lee J . Age and weight at first mating affects plasma leptin concentration but no effects on reproductive performance of gilts. J Anim Sci Technol. 2019; 61(5):285-293. PMC: 6778857. DOI: 10.5187/jast.2019.61.5.285. View

3.
Cameron R . Pregnancy diagnosis in the sow by rectal examination. Aust Vet J. 1977; 53(9):432-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1977.tb05492.x. View

4.
Peltoniemi O, Bjorkman S, Oropeza-Moe M, Oliviero C . Developments of reproductive management and biotechnology in the pig. Anim Reprod. 2020; 16(3):524-538. PMC: 7234181. DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2019-0055. View

5.
Auvigne V, Leneveu P, Jehannin C, Peltoniemi O, Salle E . Seasonal infertility in sows: a five year field study to analyze the relative roles of heat stress and photoperiod. Theriogenology. 2010; 74(1):60-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.12.019. View