» Articles » PMID: 37093492

Comparison of Tc-DTPA and Cr-EDTA for Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement with the Continuous Infusion Method

Overview
Journal J Nephrol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37093492
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In late 2018, the production of Chromium-labelled ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (Cr-EDTA), a validated and widely used radio-isotopic tracer for measuring glomerular filtration rate, was halted. Technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-DTPA) has been validated for GFR measurement with a single bolus injection, a procedure not suitable in patients with extracellular compartment hyperhydration. In such cases, a bolus followed by continuous infusion of the tracer is required. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Tc-DTPA with the infusion protocol can replace Cr-EDTA for GFR measurement.

Methods: We conducted a prospective single centre study during February and March 2019. All patients referred for GFR measurement received both radiotracers simultaneously: Cr-EDTA and Tc-DTPA bolus and continuous infusion were administered concomitantly through the same intravenous route. Over four and a half hours, plasma and urine samples were collected to calculate urinary and plasma clearance.

Results: Twenty-two patients were included (mean age 63.4 ± 17.5 years; 68% men). Mean urinary clearance of Cr-EDTA and Tc-DTPA was 52.4 ± 22.5 mL/min and 52.8 ± 22.6 mL/min, respectively (p = 0.47), with a mean bias of 0.39 ± 2.50 mL/min, an accuracy within 10% of 100% (95% CI 100; 100) and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.994. Mean plasma clearance of Cr-EDTA and Tc-DTPA was 54.8 ± 20.9 mL/min and 54.4 ± 20.9 mL/min, respectively (p = 0.61), with a mean bias of - 0.43 ± 3.89 mL/min, an accuracy within 10% of 77% (95% CI 59; 91) and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.983.

Conclusions: Urinary and plasma clearance of Tc-DTPA can be used with the infusion protocol to measure GFR.

References
1.
Levey A, Bosch J, Lewis J, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D . A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130(6):461-70. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. View

2.
Froissart M, Rossert J, Jacquot C, Paillard M, Houillier P . Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations for estimating renal function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16(3):763-73. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2004070549. View

3.
Soveri I, Berg U, Bjork J, Elinder C, Grubb A, Mejare I . Measuring GFR: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; 64(3):411-24. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.04.010. View

4.
Levey A, Inker L . Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Health and Disease: A State of the Art Review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017; 102(3):405-419. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.729. View

5.
Bui T, Prot-Bertoye C, Ayari H, Baron S, Bertocchio J, Bureau C . Safety of Inulin and Sinistrin: Combining Several Sources for Pharmacovigilance Purposes. Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:725417. PMC: 8637630. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.725417. View