» Articles » PMID: 37092011

Delivery of an At-home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intervention to Mitigate Pain in Patients with End-stage Kidney Disease Receiving Hemodialysis (ESKD/HD)

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37092011
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Poorly controlled pain remains a problem for many patients with end-stage kidney disease requiring hemodialysis (ESKD/HD) and customary approaches to pain management (e.g., opioids, non-steroidals) confer substantial risk. Accordingly, non-pharmacologic therapies are needed for use in this population. Non-invasive transcranial Direct Current Simulation (tDCS) constitutes a promising nonpharmacologic method for pain management in affected individuals.

Aims: This study seeks to: 1) determine the effects of an 8-week course of at-home tDCS vs. sham tDCS on pain intensity, pain interference, medication usage, quality of life, and mood; 2) determine if tDCS effects vary by race/ethnicity; and 3) ascertain patient satisfaction with device use.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial will enroll 100 ESKD/HD patients with moderate-to-severe (≥4 on 0-10 scale) chronic pain. The active study intervention consists of 20 min of tDCS delivered over the primary motor cortex 5 days/week for 8 weeks. The comparator is a sham procedure that provides no effective stimulation. The primary outcome analysis will evaluate efficacy of tDCS for pain reduction after two months of stimulation. We will also assess the effects of treatment on analgesic consumption, pain interference, depressed mood, and quality of life. The statistical plan will include fixed classification factors for treatment (vs. sham), clinic sites, and assessment time, and the interaction of these factors adjusting for covariates (e.g., race/ethnicity, pain level).

Conclusion: At-home tDCS constitutes a promising nonpharmacologic treatment for pain mitigation in persons with ESKD/HD. This unique RCT could transform the way pain is managed in this vulnerable population.

Trial Registration: NCT05311956.

References
1.
Ishida J, McCulloch C, Steinman M, Grimes B, Johansen K . Gabapentin and Pregabalin Use and Association with Adverse Outcomes among Hemodialysis Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 29(7):1970-1978. PMC: 6050935. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2018010096. View

2.
Borckardt J, Romagnuolo J, Reeves S, Madan A, Frohman H, Beam W . Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for decreasing post-ERCP pain: a randomized, sham-controlled, pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(6):1158-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.050. View

3.
Nitsche M, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W . Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 56:255-76. DOI: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. View

4.
Desai N, Lora C, Lash J, Ricardo A . CKD and ESRD in US Hispanics. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018; 73(1):102-111. PMC: 6186206. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.02.354. View

5.
Woods A, Antal A, Bikson M, Boggio P, Brunoni A, Celnik P . A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015; 127(2):1031-1048. PMC: 4747791. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012. View