» Articles » PMID: 37091743

The Impact of Image Acquisition Parameters and ComBat Harmonization on the Predictive Performance of Radiomics: A Renal Cell Carcinoma Model

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37091743
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Radiomics, one of the potential methods for developing clinical biomarker, is one of the exponentially growing research fields. In addition to its potential, several limitations have been identified in this field, and most importantly the effects of variations in imaging parameters on radiomic features (RFs). In this study, we investigate the potential of RFs to predict overall survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma, as well as the impact of ComBat harmonization on the performance of RF models. We assessed the robustness of the results by performing the analyses a thousand times. Publicly available CT scans of 179 patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The scans were acquired using different imaging vendors and parameters in different medical centers. The performance was calculated by averaging the metrics over all runs. On average, the clinical model significantly outperformed the radiomic models. The use of ComBat harmonization, on average, did not significantly improve the performance of radiomic models. Hence, the variability in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters significantly affect the performance of radiomic models. The development of radiomic specific harmonization techniques remain a necessity for the advancement of the field.

Citing Articles

Myocardial perfusion SPECT radiomic features reproducibility assessment: Impact of image reconstruction and harmonization.

Gharibi O, Hajianfar G, Sabouri M, Mohebi M, Bagheri S, Arian F Med Phys. 2024; 52(2):965-977.

PMID: 39470363 PMC: 11788242. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17490.


Differential Radiomics-Based Signature Predicts Lung Cancer Risk Accounting for Imaging Parameters in NLST Cohort.

Ebrahimpour L, Despres P, Manem V Cancer Med. 2024; 13(20):e70359.

PMID: 39463128 PMC: 11513548. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70359.


The reproducibility and predictivity of radiomic features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ibrahim A, Guha S, Lu L, Geng P, Wu Q, Chou Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310486.

PMID: 39269960 PMC: 11398651. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310486.


Impact of Preprocessing Parameters in Medical Imaging-Based Radiomic Studies: A Systematic Review.

Trojani V, Bassi M, Verzellesi L, Bertolini M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123396 PMC: 11311340. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152668.


Machine learning-based identification of contrast-enhancement phase of computed tomography scans.

Guha S, Ibrahim A, Wu Q, Geng P, Chou Y, Yang H PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0294581.

PMID: 38306329 PMC: 10836663. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294581.

References
1.
Traverso A, Kazmierski M, Shi Z, Kalendralis P, Welch M, Dahl Nissen H . Stability of radiomic features of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for locally advanced rectal cancer in response to image pre-processing. Phys Med. 2019; 61:44-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.04.009. View

2.
Refaee T, Salahuddin Z, Widaatalla Y, Primakov S, Woodruff H, Hustinx R . CT Reconstruction Kernels and the Effect of Pre- and Post-Processing on the Reproducibility of Handcrafted Radiomic Features. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(4). PMC: 9030848. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040553. View

3.
Fortin J, Parker D, Tunc B, Watanabe T, Elliott M, Ruparel K . Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data. Neuroimage. 2017; 161:149-170. PMC: 5736019. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.047. View

4.
Shafiq-Ul-Hassan M, Zhang G, Latifi K, Ullah G, Hunt D, Balagurunathan Y . Intrinsic dependencies of CT radiomic features on voxel size and number of gray levels. Med Phys. 2017; 44(3):1050-1062. PMC: 5462462. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12123. View

5.
Zhao B, Tan Y, Tsai W, Qi J, Xie C, Lu L . Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23428. PMC: 4806325. DOI: 10.1038/srep23428. View