» Articles » PMID: 37091722

Dematerialized Participation Challenges: Methods and Practices for Online Focus Groups

Overview
Journal Front Sociol
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37091722
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study explores the limitations and benefits of different approaches to conducting online focus groups and illustrates an online focus group protocol used within the Value for Schools project in Italy. According to the project evaluation design, 13 online focus groups were organized, with the participation of 101 teachers and 37 school principals. The protocol setup, incorporation, and reorganization of the indications have been discussed in the literature, addressing the methodological and practical issues, such as the selection of participants and preliminary communication with them; the web conference platform (Zoom Business); timing, as well as access times and mode; the roles of the researchers involved (moderator, co-host technical assistant, co-host-observer, co-host-animator) and their integration spaces; technological support; and animation tools. The recording and transcription tools and subsequent analysis of the textual corpus are presented. Finally, the authors discuss the validation and reliability of online focus group protocols.

Citing Articles

Validation of a sports nutrition knowledge questionnaire for Sri Lankan track and field athletes.

Jayawardena R, Weerasinghe K, Trakman G, Madhujith T, Hills A, Kalupahana N BMC Nutr. 2024; 10(1):135.

PMID: 39390532 PMC: 11468348. DOI: 10.1186/s40795-024-00944-9.


Stakeholder perspectives of family interventions for schizophrenia in Indonesia: a qualitative study.

Susanti H, Brooks H, Keliat B, Bradshaw T, Wulandari D, Fadilah R BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):59.

PMID: 38254095 PMC: 10804701. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05504-w.


"Personally, I feel sorry, but professionally, I don't have a choice." Understanding the drivers of anti-Roma discrimination on the rental housing market.

Varadi L, Szilasi B, Kende A, Braverman J, Simonovits G, Simonovits B Front Sociol. 2023; 8:1223205.

PMID: 37534328 PMC: 10393131. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1223205.

References
1.
Agan J, Koch L, Rumrill Jr P . The use of focus groups in rehabilitation research. Work. 2008; 31(2):259-69. View

2.
Morse J . Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015; 25(9):1212-22. DOI: 10.1177/1049732315588501. View

3.
Keen S, Lomeli-Rodriguez M, Joffe H . From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond. Int J Qual Methods. 2022; 21:16094069221105075. PMC: 9167989. DOI: 10.1177/16094069221105075. View

4.
Tuttas C . Lessons learned using Web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual Health Res. 2014; 25(1):122-33. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314549602. View

5.
Woodyatt C, Finneran C, Stephenson R . In-Person Versus Online Focus Group Discussions: A Comparative Analysis of Data Quality. Qual Health Res. 2016; 26(6):741-9. DOI: 10.1177/1049732316631510. View