One Cue Does Not Fit All: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Cueing on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease
Overview
Psychology
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
The difficulty in assessing FOG and the variety of existing cues, hamper to determine which cueing modality should be applied and which FOG-related aspect should be targeted to reach personalized treatments for FOG. This systematic review aimed to highlight: i) whether cues could reduce FOG and improve FOG-related gait parameters, ii) which cues are the most effective, iii) whether medication state (ON-OFF) affects cues-related results. Thirty-three repeated measure design studies assessing cueing effectiveness were included and subdivided according to gait tasks (gait initiation, walking, turning) and to the medication state. Main results reveal that: preparatory phase of gait initiation benefit from visual and auditory cues; spatio-temporal parameters (e.g., step and stride length) are improved by visual cues during walking; turning time and step time variability are reduced by applying auditory and visual cues. Some findings on the potential benefits of cueing on FOG and FOG gait-related parameters were found. Questions remain about which are the best behavioral strategies according to FOG features and PD clinical characteristics.
Geerse D, Hoogendoorn E, van Doorn P, van Bergem J, van Dam A, Hardeman L Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1512409.
PMID: 40066314 PMC: 11891067. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1512409.
Kakegawa K, Matsuda T Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(1.
PMID: 39796804 PMC: 11722622. DOI: 10.3390/s25010016.
Azoidou V, Noyce A, Simonet C Clin Park Relat Disord. 2024; 11:100284.
PMID: 39640985 PMC: 11617393. DOI: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2024.100284.
Fortunati M, Febbi M, Negro M, Gennaro F, DAntona G, Crisafulli O Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).
PMID: 39201194 PMC: 11353983. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161636.
Fang Y, Wang J, Nie D, Tang Y Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(7):2852-2863.
PMID: 39114711 PMC: 11301470. DOI: 10.62347/JTRH2408.