Echocardiographic Phenotype for Refined Risk Stratification and Treatment Selection in Light Chain Amyloidosis with Heart Failure
Overview
Affiliations
Aims: Light chain amyloidosis (AL) patients with heart failure (HF) are usually with revised Mayo (rMayo) stage III/IV disease and have a poor prognosis. We sought to investigate whether and what echocardiographic phenotype provides value for further risk stratification and guiding optimal risk-adapted treatment in this subgroup of AL patients.
Methods And Results: 95 AL patients who presented with HF and were on rMayo stage III/IV were retrospectively included. Of them, 51 patients (53.7%) were with stage III, 44 (46.3%) were with stage IV, and 44 (46.3%) underwent chemotherapy. Laboratory and echocardiographic measurements were acquired before the initiation of chemotherapy. The relevance of different variables with survival was assessed in the entire cohort, chemotherapy, and non-chemotherapy group. By Multivariate Cox regression analysis, right ventricular wall thickness (RVT) [HR 1.145, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.026-1.279, P = 0.016], relative wall thickness (RWT) (HR 6.709, 95% CI 1.101-40.877, P = 0.039), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% (HR 1.939, 95% CI 1.048-3.590, P = 0.035) were found to be independently associated with survival in the entire cohort, RWT (HR 15.488, 95% CI 2.045-117.292, P = 0.008) in the non-chemotherapy group, and RVT (HR 1.331, 95% CI 1.054-1.681, P = 0.016) in the chemotherapy group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that survival was significantly reduced in the presence of RVT ≥ 6.5 mm or LVEF < 50% in the entire cohort, and the significance of RVT ≥ 6.5 mm was irrespective of rMayo stages. In the chemotherapy group, survival was decreased if RVT ≥ 6.5 mm alone or together with RWT ≥ 0.67 were present, particularly in patients on rMayo stage IV.
Conclusions: Echocardiographic phenotype provides incremental value beyond rMayo staging for predicting survival and could further guide treatment in advanced AL with HF. Those with high-risk echocardiographic phenotypes as higher RVT and RWT and lower LVEF had a worse prognosis.