» Articles » PMID: 37083986

A Learning Curve in 3D Virtual Surgical Planned Orthognathic Surgery

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Apr 21
PMID 37083986
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the surgical accuracy of 3D virtual surgical planned orthognathic surgery and the influence of posterior impaction and magnitude of the planned movements on a possible learning curve.

Materials And Methods: This prospective cohort study included subjects who underwent bimaxillary surgery between 2016 and 2020 at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen. 3D virtual surgical planning (VSP) was performed with CBCT data and digitalized dentition data. By using voxel-based matching with pre- and postoperative CBCT data the maxillary movements were quantified in six degrees of freedom. The primary outcome variable, surgical accuracy, was defined as the difference between the planned and achieved maxillary movement.

Results: Based on 124 subjects, the surgical accuracy increased annually from 2016 to 2020 in terms of vertical translations (0.82 ± 0.28 mm; p = 0.038) and yaw rotations (0.68 ± 0.22°; p = 0.028). An increase in surgical accuracy was observed when combining all six degrees of freedom (p = 0.021) and specifically between 2016 and 2020 (p = 0.004). An unfavorable learning curve was seen with posterior impaction and with a greater magnitude of movements.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated a significant increase in surgical accuracy annually and therefore supports the presence of a learning curve.

Clinical Relevance: Cases with planned maxillary posterior impaction and/or a great magnitude of jaw movements should be transferred from the 3D VSP with extra care to obtain a satisfactory surgical accuracy.

Citing Articles

A narrative review of present knowledge and digital approaches in orthognathic surgery.

Friedrich C, Graw C, Kroplin J Innov Surg Sci. 2024; 9(4):175-179.

PMID: 39678119 PMC: 11638821. DOI: 10.1515/iss-2024-0018.


Virtual surgical plan with custom surgical guide for orthognathic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lee Y, Oh J, Kim S Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024; 46(1):39.

PMID: 39541065 PMC: 11564499. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-024-00449-2.


Is there a difference in surgical accuracy following bimaxillary surgery between cleft and non-cleft patients?.

Beek D, Visser D, Chen Y, Baan F, Nienhuijs M, Xi T Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(1):112.

PMID: 38265487 PMC: 10808377. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05517-5.

References
1.
Monson L . Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Semin Plast Surg. 2014; 27(3):145-8. PMC: 3805998. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1357111. View

2.
Gobic M, Kralj M, Harmicar D, Cerovic R, Mady Maricic B, Spalj S . Dentofacial deformity and orthognatic surgery: Influence on self-esteem and aspects of quality of life. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021; 49(4):277-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.024. View

3.
Tran N, Tantidhnazet S, Raocharernporn S, Kiattavornchareon S, Pairuchvej V, Wongsirichat N . Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Planning in Surgery-First Orthognathic Surgery: Planning Versus Outcome. J Clin Med Res. 2018; 10(5):429-436. PMC: 5862091. DOI: 10.14740/jocmr3372w. View

4.
Sutton D, Wayman J, Griffin S . Learning curve for oesophageal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 1998; 85(10):1399-402. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00962.x. View

5.
Eslamipour F, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Le B, Shahmoradi M . A Retrospective Analysis of Dentofacial Deformities and Orthognathic Surgeries. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 7(1):73-77. PMC: 5502519. DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_104_16. View