Gait Pattern Analysis in the Home Environment As a Key Factor for the Reliable Assessment of Shunt Responsiveness in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Apr 21

PMID 37082443

Authors

Sandra Fernandes Dias

Christina Graf

Elisabeth Jehli

Markus Florian Oertel

Julia Mahler

Marianne Schmid Daners

Lennart Henning Stieglitz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The identification of patients with gait disturbance associated with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is challenging. This is due to the multifactorial causes of gait disturbance in elderly people and the single moment examination of laboratory tests.

Objective: We aimed to assess whether the use of gait sensors in a patient's home environment could help establish a reliable diagnostic tool to identify patients with iNPH by differentiating them from elderly healthy controls (EHC).

Methods: Five wearable inertial measurement units were used in 11 patients with iNPH and 20 matched EHCs. Data were collected in the home environment for 72 h. Fifteen spatio-temporal gait parameters were analyzed. Patients were examined preoperatively and postoperatively. We performed an iNPH sub-group analysis to assess differences between responders vs. non-responders. We aimed to identify parameters that are able to predict a reliable response to VP-shunt placement.

Results: Nine gait parameters significantly differ between EHC and patients with iNPH preoperatively. Postoperatively, patients with iNPH showed an improvement in the swing phase ( = 0.042), and compared to the EHC group, there was no significant difference regarding the cadence and traveled arm distance. Patients with a good VP-shunt response (NPH recovery rate of ≥5) significantly differ from the non-responders regarding cycle time, cycle time deviation, number of steps, gait velocity, straight length, stance phase, and stance to swing ratio. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed good sensitivity for a preoperative stride length of ≥0.44 m and gait velocity of ≥0.39 m/s.

Conclusion: There was a significant difference in 60% of the analyzed gait parameters between EHC and patients with iNPH, with a clear improvement toward the normalization of the cadence and traveled arm distance postoperatively, and a clear improvement of the swing phase. Patients with iNPH with a good response to VP-shunt significantly differ from the non-responders with an ameliorated gait pattern.

Citing Articles

Technological Advances for Gait and Balance in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review.

Zampogna A, Patera M, Falletti M, Pinola G, Asci F, Suppa A Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001656 PMC: 11852021. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020135.

Survival After Shunt Therapy in Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Meta-Analysis of 1614 Patients.

Wach J, Guresir A, Guresir E, Vychopen M Neurol Int. 2024; 16(6):1438-1450.

PMID: 39585066 PMC: 11587452. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16060107.

The effectiveness of various CSF diversion surgeries in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Salih A, Arif A, Varadpande M, Fernandes R, Jankovic D, Kalasauskas D EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102891.

PMID: 39539993 PMC: 11558045. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102891.

Kinematic movement and balance parameter analysis in neurological gait disorders.

Na C, Siebers H, Reim J, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Clusmann H J Biol Eng. 2024; 18(1):6.

PMID: 38225612 PMC: 10790442. DOI: 10.1186/s13036-023-00398-w.

References

Hakim S, Adams R . The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci. 1965; 2(4):307-27. DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(65)90016-x. View

Kuruvithadam K, Menner M, Taylor W, Zeilinger M, Stieglitz L, Schmid Daners M . Data-Driven Investigation of Gait Patterns in Individuals Affected by Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(19). PMC: 8512819. DOI: 10.3390/s21196451. View

Abou L, Peters J, Wong E, Akers R, Dossou M, Sosnoff J . Gait and Balance Assessments using Smartphone Applications in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. J Med Syst. 2021; 45(9):87. PMC: 8364438. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01760-5. View

Kiefer M, Eymann R, Komenda Y, Steudel W . [A grading system for chronic hydrocephalus]. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2003; 64(3):109-15. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41881. View

Hebb A, Cusimano M . Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery. 2002; 49(5):1166-84; discussion 1184-6. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200111000-00028. View

Matsuoka T, Kawano S, Fujimoto K, Kawahara M, Hashimoto H . Characteristics of cognitive function evaluation using the Montreal cognitive assessment in a cerebrospinal fluid tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019; 186:105524. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105524. View

Ferrari A, Milletti D, Giannini G, Cevoli S, Oppi F, Palandri G . The effects of cerebrospinal fluid tap-test on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: an inertial sensors based assessment. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):7. PMC: 6966881. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0638-1. View

Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J . pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12:77. PMC: 3068975. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77. View

Golz L, Ruppert F, Meier U, Lemcke J . Outcome of modern shunt therapy in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus 6 years postoperatively. J Neurosurg. 2014; 121(4):771-5. DOI: 10.3171/2014.6.JNS131211. View

10.

Gallia G, Rigamonti D, Williams M . The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006; 2(7):375-81. DOI: 10.1038/ncpneuro0237. View

11.

Grasso G, Torregrossa F, Leone L, Frisella A, Landi A . Long-Term Efficacy of Shunt Therapy in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg. 2019; 129:e458-e463. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.183. View

12.

Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck J, Drucke H, Johnk K, Diercks C, Palmie S . Gait analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus--which parameters respond to the CSF tap test?. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000; 111(9):1678-86. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00362-x. View

13.

Mohwald K, Wuehr M, Decker J, Asch E, Schenkel F, Illigens B . Quantification of pathological gait parameter thresholds of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients in clinical gait analysis. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18295. PMC: 9622747. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22692-1. View

14.

Meier U . The grading of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2002; 47(3):54-8. DOI: 10.1515/bmte.2002.47.3.54. View

15.

Anile C, De Bonis P, Albanese A, Di Chirico A, Mangiola A, Petrella G . Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg. 2010; 113(1):64-73. DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS091296. View

16.

Bradley Jr W, Whittemore A, Watanabe A, Davis S, Teresi L, Homyak M . Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991; 12(1):31-9. PMC: 8367539. View

17.

Shinoda N, Hirai O, Hori S, Mikami K, Bando T, Shimo D . Utility of MRI-based disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus scoring for predicting prognosis after surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical research. J Neurosurg. 2017; 127(6):1436-1442. DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161080. View

18.

Virhammar J, Laurell K, Cesarini K, Larsson E . The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2013; 120(1):178-84. DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.JNS13575. View

19.

Hashimoto M, Ishikawa M, Mori E, Kuwana N . Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2010; 7:18. PMC: 2987762. DOI: 10.1186/1743-8454-7-18. View

20.

Nikaido Y, Akisue T, Kajimoto Y, Ikeji T, Kawami Y, Urakami H . The effect of CSF drainage on ambulatory center of mass movement in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Gait Posture. 2018; 63:5-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.024. View