The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Person-centred, Doctor-patient Relationship: Some Problems and Solutions

Overview

Journal BMC Med Inform Decis Mak

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2023 Apr 20

PMID 37081503

Authors

Aurelia Sauerbrei

Angeliki Kerasidou

Federica Lucivero

Nina Hallowell

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is often cited as a possible solution to current issues faced by healthcare systems. This includes the freeing up of time for doctors and facilitating person-centred doctor-patient relationships. However, given the novelty of artificial intelligence tools, there is very little concrete evidence on their impact on the doctor-patient relationship or on how to ensure that they are implemented in a way which is beneficial for person-centred care.Given the importance of empathy and compassion in the practice of person-centred care, we conducted a literature review to explore how AI impacts these two values. Besides empathy and compassion, shared decision-making, and trust relationships emerged as key values in the reviewed papers. We identified two concrete ways which can help ensure that the use of AI tools have a positive impact on person-centred doctor-patient relationships. These are (1) using AI tools in an assistive role and (2) adapting medical education. The study suggests that we need to take intentional steps in order to ensure that the deployment of AI tools in healthcare has a positive impact on person-centred doctor-patient relationships. We argue that the proposed solutions are contingent upon clarifying the values underlying future healthcare systems.

Citing Articles

Applications of Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Patients with Chiari Malformation Type I: A Scoping Review.

Symeou S, Lampros M, Zagorianakou P, Voulgaris S, Alexiou G Children (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40003345 PMC: 11853870. DOI: 10.3390/children12020244.

Commentary on "Can AI Answer My Questions? Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Assessment for Abdominoplasty Patients".

Habibabadi M, Bouya S, Mamaghani A Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 39984666 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-025-04776-1.

Advancing Medical Research Through Artificial Intelligence: Progressive and Transformative Strategies: A Literature Review.

Al-Qudimat A, Fares Z, Elaarag M, Osman M, Al-Zoubi R, Aboumarzouk O Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70200.

PMID: 39980823 PMC: 11839394. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70200.

Cultural variation in trust and acceptability of artificial intelligence diagnostics for dementia.

Chandra A, Senthilvel K, Anjum R, Uchegbu I, Smith L, Beaumont H J Alzheimers Dis. 2025; :13872877251319353.

PMID: 39956979 PMC: 7617421. DOI: 10.1177/13872877251319353.

The Use of AI in Mental Health Services to Support Decision-Making: Scoping Review.

Auf H, Svedberg P, Nygren J, Nair M, Lundgren L J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63548.

PMID: 39854710 PMC: 11806275. DOI: 10.2196/63548.

References

Dagher L, Shi H, Zhao Y, Marrouche N . Wearables in cardiology: Here to stay. Heart Rhythm. 2020; 17(5 Pt B):889-895. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.023. View

Young A, Amara D, Bhattacharya A, Wei M . Patient and general public attitudes towards clinical artificial intelligence: a mixed methods systematic review. Lancet Digit Health. 2021; 3(9):e599-e611. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00132-1. View

Singer T, Klimecki O . Empathy and compassion. Curr Biol. 2014; 24(18):R875-R878. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054. View

McDougall R . Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI. J Med Ethics. 2018; 45(3):156-160. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105118. View

Hojat M, Louis D, Markham F, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella J . Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011; 86(3):359-64. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1. View

Chen J . Playing to our human strengths to prepare medical students for the future. Korean J Med Educ. 2017; 29(3):193-197. PMC: 5583434. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2017.65. View

Alrassi J, Katsufrakis P, Chandran L . Technology Can Augment, but Not Replace, Critical Human Skills Needed for Patient Care. Acad Med. 2020; 96(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003733. View

Spiro H . Commentary: The practice of empathy. Acad Med. 2009; 84(9):1177-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b18934. View

Jotterand F, Bosco C . Keeping the "Human in the Loop" in the Age of Artificial Intelligence : Accompanying Commentary for "Correcting the Brain?" by Rainey and Erden. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020; 26(5):2455-2460. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00241-1. View

10.

Steinhubl S, Topol E . Moving From Digitalization to Digitization in Cardiovascular Care: Why Is it Important, and What Could it Mean for Patients and Providers?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(13):1489-96. PMC: 4583658. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.006. View

11.

Triberti S, Durosini I, Pravettoni G . A "Third Wheel" Effect in Health Decision Making Involving Artificial Entities: A Psychological Perspective. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:117. PMC: 7199477. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00117. View

12.

Wartman S . The Empirical Challenge of 21st-Century Medical Education. Acad Med. 2019; 94(10):1412-1415. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002866. View

13.

Sparrow R, Hatherley J . High Hopes for "Deep Medicine"? AI, Economics, and the Future of Care. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020; 50(1):14-17. DOI: 10.1002/hast.1079. View

14.

Oran D, Topol E . The rise of the virtualist. Lancet. 2019; 394(10192):17. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31498-9. View

15.

Mercer S, Neumann M, Wirtz M, Fitzpatrick B, Vojt G . General practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and patient-reported outcomes in primary care in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland--a pilot prospective study using structural equation modeling. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73(2):240-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.022. View

16.

Moss J, Roberts M, Shea L, Jones C, Kilgannon H, Edmondson D . Healthcare provider compassion is associated with lower PTSD symptoms among patients with life-threatening medical emergencies: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2019; 45(6):815-822. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05601-5. View

17.

Kim S, Kaplowitz S, Johnston M . The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof. 2004; 27(3):237-51. DOI: 10.1177/0163278704267037. View

18.

Blease C, Kaptchuk T, Bernstein M, Mandl K, Halamka J, DesRoches C . Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Primary Care: Exploratory Qualitative Study of UK General Practitioners' Views. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(3):e12802. PMC: 6446158. DOI: 10.2196/12802. View

19.

Yaghy A, Shields J, Shields C . Representing Communication, Compassion, and Competence in the Era of AI. AMA J Ethics. 2019; 21(11):E1009-1013. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1009. View

20.

Jeffrey D . Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: Is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter?. J R Soc Med. 2016; 109(12):446-452. PMC: 5154411. DOI: 10.1177/0141076816680120. View