» Articles » PMID: 37077932

Treatment of Post-acne Scarring with Long-pulsed and Q-switched 1,064nm Nd:YAG Laser

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 20
PMID 37077932
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Acne scarring is one of the most dramatic consequences of inflammatory acne. It can lead to physical disfigurement and psychological burden on the affected individuals. Many treatment options for post-acne scarring are used, with variable results. Nonablative lasers, such as the 1,064nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, are known to ameliorate acne scar appearance by stimulating collagen production and dermal remodeling.

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and long-term effects of long-pulsed and Q-switched 1,064nm Nd:YAG lasers in the treatment of acne scars.

Methods: From March to December 2019, a total of 25 patients with different skin types with acne scars were treated. Patients were divided into two groups. In Group I, 12 patients received a combination of Q-switched 1,064nm Nd:YAG laser, then long-pulsed 1,064nm Nd:YAG laser. In Group II, 13 patients received a combination of long-pulsed 1,064nm Nd:YAG laser, then Q-switched 1,064nm Nd:YAG laser. All patients received a total of six sessions at two-week intervals.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the studied groups in skin type, lesions, or scar type. A positive response with either good or excellent results was documented in 43 patients, corresponding to 86. Six percent of the patients included in this study. Excellent response was observed in a total of 17 patients (26.6%). Twenty-six patients (60%) showed a moderate-to-good response, while seven patients (13.4 %) showed a fair response. The majority of patients in this study had an excellent-to-good response, with an 86.6% improvement of post-acne scars after laser sessions.

Conclusion: Q-switched and long-pulsed 1,064nm Nd:YAG lasers are considered an efficient and safe modality for the treatment of mild and moderate post-acne scars. Both lasers can enhance dermal collagen remodeling and spare the epidermis with minimal downtime after the procedure.

References
1.
Sabry H, Hegazy M, Ahmed E, Salem R . Q-Switched 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for post acne scarring: A split-face comparative study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022; 38(5):465-470. DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12773. View

2.
Rivera A . Acne scarring: a review and current treatment modalities. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008; 59(4):659-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.05.029. View

3.
Lee D, Choi Y, Min S, Yoon M, Suh D . Comparison of a 585-nm pulsed dye laser and a 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of acne scars: A randomized split-face clinical study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009; 60(5):801-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.883. View

4.
Hazarika N . Acne vulgaris: new evidence in pathogenesis and future modalities of treatment. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019; 32(3):277-285. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1654075. View

5.
Zaleski-Larsen L, Fabi S, McGraw T, Taylor M . Acne Scar Treatment: A Multimodality Approach Tailored to Scar Type. Dermatol Surg. 2016; 42 Suppl 2:S139-49. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000746. View