» Articles » PMID: 37072455

Nationwide Sample Data Analysis of Additional Surgery Rate After Anterior or Posterior Cervical Spinal Surgery

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Apr 18
PMID 37072455
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical spinal disease are dependent on the selection of surgical techniques. Although a standardized decision cannot be made in an actual clinical setting, continued education is provided to standardize the medical practice among surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to supervise and regularly update overall surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the rate of additional surgery between anterior and posterior surgeries for degenerative cervical spinal disease using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) nationwide patient database. The NHIS-NSC is a population-based cohort with about a million participants. This retrospective cohort study included 741 adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent their first cervical spinal surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disease. The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. An event was defined as the registration of any type of cervical spinal surgery during the follow-up period. Event-free survival analysis was used for outcome analysis, and the following factors were used as covariates for adjustment: location of disease, sex, age, type of insurance, disability, type of hospital, Charles comorbidity Index, and osteoporosis. Anterior cervical surgery was selected for 75.0% of the patients, and posterior cervical surgery for the remaining 25.0%. Cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, hard disc, or soft disc was the primary diagnosis in 78.0% of the patients, and central spinal stenosis was the primary diagnosis in 22.0% of them. Additional surgery was performed for 5.0% of the patients after anterior cervical surgery and 6.5% of the patients after posterior cervical surgery (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.74). The rates of additional surgery were not different between anterior and posterior cervical surgeries. The results would be helpful in evaluating current practice as a whole and adjusting the health insurance policy.

Citing Articles

The use of cervical interfacet devices and related clinical outcomes.

Hisey M, Courtois E, Ohnmeiss D Eur Spine J. 2025; 34(3):1211-1217.

PMID: 39841223 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08626-7.


Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: An Overview.

Saunders L, Sandhu H, McBride L, Maniarasu V, Taylor S, Dhokia R Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e50387.

PMID: 38213348 PMC: 10783125. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50387.

References
1.
Nagoshi N, Nori S, Tsuji O, Suzuki S, Okada E, Yagi M . Surgical and Functional Outcomes of Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients With Mild Kyphotic Cervical Alignment. Neurospine. 2022; 18(4):749-757. PMC: 8752715. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2142792.396. View

2.
Chen Q, Qin M, Chen F, Ni B, Guo Q, Han Z . Comparison of Outcomes Between Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion and Posterior Laminoplasty in the Treatment of 4-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 2019; 125:e341-e347. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.075. View

3.
Veeravagu A, Connolly I, Lamsam L, Li A, Swinney C, Azad T . Surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of a national, administrative, longitudinal database. Neurosurg Focus. 2016; 40(6):E11. DOI: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1669. View

4.
Seng C, Tow B, Siddiqui M, Srivastava A, Wang L, Yew A . Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty. Spine J. 2013; 13(7):723-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.038. View

5.
Wadhwa H, Sharma J, Varshneya K, Fatemi P, Nathan J, Medress Z . Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 152:e738-e744. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.064. View