» Articles » PMID: 37072350

Severe Cytopenia After CD19 CAR T-cell Therapy: a Retrospective Study from the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party

Abstract

We investigated the incidence and outcome of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells-associated Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥grade 3 cytopenia. In the EBMT CAR-T registry, we identified 398 adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma who had been treated with CAR-T-cells with axicel (62%) or tisacel (38%) before August 2021 and had cytopenia status documented for the first 100 days. Most patients had received two or three previous lines of therapy, however, 22.3% had received four or more. Disease status was progressive in 80.4%, stable in 5.0% and partial/complete remission in 14.6%. 25.9% of the patients had received a transplantation before. Median age was 61.4 years (min-max; IQR=18.7-81; (52.9-69.5)).The cumulative incidence of ≥grade 3 cytopenia was 9.0% at 30 days (95% CI (6.5 to 12.1)) and 12.1% at 100 days after CAR T-cell infusion (95% CI (9.1 to 15.5)). The median time from CAR-T infusion to cytopenia onset was 16.5 days (min-max; IQR=1-90; (4-29.8)). Grade 3 and grade 4 CTCAE cytopenia occurred in 15.2% and 84.8%, respectively. In 47.6% there was no resolution.Severe cytopenia had no significant impact on overall survival (OS) (HR 1.13 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.73), p=0.57). However, patients with severe cytopenia had a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.22), p=0.02) and a higher relapse incidence (HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.23), p=0.03). In those patients who developed severe cytopenia during the first 100 days (n=47), OS, PFS, relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality at 12 months after diagnosis of severe cytopenia were 53.6% (95% CI (40.3 to 71.2)), 20% (95% CI (10.4 to 38.6)), 73.5% (95% CI (55.2 to 85.2)) and 6.5% (95% CI (1.7 to 16.2)), respectively.In multivariate analysis of severe cytopenia risk factors, only year of CAR-T infusion (HR=0.61, 95% CI (0.39 to 0.95), p=0.028) and total number of treatment lines before CAR-T infusion (one or two lines vs three or more, HR=0.41, 95% CI (0.21 to 0.83), p=0.013) had a significant positive association with the incidence of cytopenia. Other factors, such as previous transplantation, disease status at time of CAR-T, patient age and patient sex, had no significant association.Our data provide insight on frequency and clinical relevance of severe cytopenia after CAR T-cell therapy in the European real-world setting.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Review of Early and Late Toxicities in CAR T-Cell Therapy and Bispecific Antibody Treatments for Hematologic Malignancies.

Bangolo A, Amoozgar B, Mansour C, Zhang L, Gill S, Ip A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858064 PMC: 11764151. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020282.


Real-World Characterization of Toxicities and Medication Management in Recipients of CAR T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Shaw J, Elsawy M, Nielsen R, Harrigan A, DiCostanzo T, Minard L Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(1).

PMID: 39851918 PMC: 11764397. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32010002.


Successful allogeneic CD34 hematopoietic stem cell boost for prolonged cytopenias following CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. On behalf of the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (GETH-TC).

Molinos-Quintana A, Martinez-Cibrian N, Alonso-Saladrigues A, Galan-Gomez V, Bailen R, Buendia-Lopez S Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024; 60(2):250-253.

PMID: 39551836 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02473-2.


Advancement and Challenges in Monitoring of CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Comprehensive Review of Parameters and Markers in Hematological Malignancies.

Ploch W, Sadowski K, Olejarz W, Basak G Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39409959 PMC: 11475293. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193339.


Delayed neutrophil recovery following BCMA CAR-T therapy in Duffy-null myeloma does not impact severe infections or survival.

Avigan Z, Bodnar S, Pan D, Catlett J, Richter J, Sanchez L Blood Adv. 2024; 9(1):202-206.

PMID: 39383457 PMC: 11758837. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024014255.


References
1.
Abramson J, Palomba M, Gordon L, Lunning M, Wang M, Arnason J . Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. Lancet. 2020; 396(10254):839-852. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0. View

2.
Rejeski K, Perez A, Sesques P, Hoster E, Berger C, Jentzsch L . CAR-HEMATOTOX: a model for CAR T-cell-related hematologic toxicity in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021; 138(24):2499-2513. PMC: 8893508. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020010543. View

3.
Jain T, Knezevic A, Pennisi M, Chen Y, Ruiz J, Purdon T . Hematopoietic recovery in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. Blood Adv. 2020; 4(15):3776-3787. PMC: 7422135. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002509. View

4.
Locke F, Miklos D, Jacobson C, Perales M, Kersten M, Oluwole O . Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2021; 386(7):640-654. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116133. View

5.
McGrath E, Chabannon C, Terwel S, Bonini C, Kuball J . Opportunities and challenges associated with the evaluation of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in real-life. Curr Opin Oncol. 2020; 32(5):427-433. DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000665. View