» Articles » PMID: 37070203

Stereomicroscopic On-site Evaluation in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Tissue Acquisition of Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions

Abstract

Background/aims: In stereomicroscopic sample isolation processing, the cutoff value (≥4 mm) of stereomicroscopically visible white cores indicates high diagnostic sensitivity. We aimed to evaluate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) using a simplified stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs).

Methods: In this multicenter prospective trial, we performed EUS-TA using a 22-gauge Franseen needle in 34 participants with SELs derived from the upper gastrointestinal muscularis propria, requiring pathological diagnosis. The presence of stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) in each specimen was assessed using stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation. The primary outcome was EUS-TA's diagnostic sensitivity with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation based on the SVWC cutoff value (≥4 mm) for malignant upper gastrointestinal SELs.

Results: The total number of punctures was 68; 61 specimens (89.7%) contained stereomicroscopically visible white cores ≥4 mm in size. The final diagnoses were gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyoma, and schwannoma in 76.5%, 14.7%, and 8.8% of the cases, respectively. The sensitivity of EUS-TA with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation based on the SVWC cutoff value for malignant SELs was 100%. The per-lesion accuracy of histological diagnosis reached the highest level (100%) at the second puncture.

Conclusion: Stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation showed high diagnostic sensitivity and could be a new method for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal SELs using EUS-TA.

Citing Articles

Role of macroscopic on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy: Results of a multicentric prospective study.

Okasha H, Hussein H, Ragab K, Abdallah O, Rouibaa F, Mohamed B World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024; 16(11):595-606.

PMID: 39600556 PMC: 11586721. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i11.595.


Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition Using Fork-Tip Needle for Subepithelial Lesions: A Single-Center Validation Study.

Watanabe M, Okuwaki K, Iwai T, Kida M, Imaizumi H, Adachi K Dig Dis Sci. 2024; 69(7):2567-2572.

PMID: 38750279 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08424-7.


What method can we choose if rapid on-site evaluation is not available for the endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions?.

Cho Y Clin Endosc. 2024; 57(1):53-55.

PMID: 38302249 PMC: 10834289. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2023.299.

References
1.
Hocke M, Topalidis T, Braden B, Dietrich C . "Clinical" cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017; 6(2):83-89. PMC: 5418972. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_21_17. View

2.
Hedenstrom P, Marschall H, Nilsson B, Demir A, Lindkvist B, Nilsson O . High clinical impact and diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided biopsy sampling of subepithelial lesions: a prospective, comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2017; 32(3):1304-1313. PMC: 5807503. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5808-2. View

3.
Conti C, Cereatti F, Grassia R . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: the fine needle aspiration or fine needle biopsy dilemma. Is the best needle yet to come?. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019; 11(8):454-471. PMC: 6715568. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.454. View

4.
Cotton P, Eisen G, Aabakken L, Baron T, Hutter M, Jacobson B . A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010; 71(3):446-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. View

5.
Biermann K, Lozano Escario M, Hebert-Magee S, Rindi G, Doglioni C . How to prepare, handle, read, and improve EUS-FNA and fine-needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: The pathologist's role. Endosc Ultrasound. 2018; 6(Suppl 3):S95-S98. PMC: 5774084. DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_71_17. View