» Articles » PMID: 37060063

Clinician Acceptability of an Antibiotic Prescribing Knowledge Support System for Primary Care: a Mixed-method Evaluation of Features and Context

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Apr 14
PMID 37060063
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Overprescribing of antibiotics is a major concern as it contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Research has found highly variable antibiotic prescribing in (UK) primary care, and to support more effective stewardship, the BRIT Project (Building Rapid Interventions to optimise prescribing) is implementing an eHealth Knowledge Support System. This will provide unique individualised analytics information to clinicians and patients at the point of care. The objective of the current study was to gauge the acceptability of the system to prescribing healthcare professionals and highlight factors to maximise intervention uptake.

Methods: Two mixed-method co-design workshops were held online with primary care prescribing healthcare professionals (n = 16). Usefulness ratings of example features were collected using online polls and online whiteboards. Verbal discussion and textual comments were analysed thematically using inductive (participant-centred) and deductive perspectives (using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability).

Results: Hierarchical thematic coding generated three overarching themes relevant to intervention use and development. Clinician concerns (focal issues) were safe prescribing, accessible information, autonomy, avoiding duplication, technical issues and time. Requirements were ease and efficiency of use, integration of systems, patient-centeredness, personalisation, and training. Important features of the system included extraction of pertinent information from patient records (such as antibiotic prescribing history), recommended actions, personalised treatment, risk indicators and electronic patient communication leaflets. Anticipated acceptability and intention to use the knowledge support system was moderate to high. Time was identified as a focal cost/ burden, but this would be outweighed if the system improved patient outcomes and increased prescribing confidence.

Conclusion: Clinicians anticipate that an eHealth knowledge support system will be a useful and acceptable way to optimise antibiotic prescribing at the point of care. The mixed method workshop highlighted issues to assist person-centred eHealth intervention development, such as the value of communicating patient outcomes. Important features were identified including the ability to efficiently extract and summarise pertinent information from the patient records, provide explainable and transparent risk information, and personalised information to support patient communication. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability enabled structured, theoretically sound feedback and creation of a profile to benchmark future evaluations. This may encourage a consistent user-focused approach to guide future eHealth intervention development.

Citing Articles

Risk of emergency hospital admission related to adverse events after antibiotic treatment in adults with a common infection: impact of COVID-19 and derivation and validation of risk prediction models.

Zhong X, Palin V, Ashcroft D, Goldacre B, Mackenna B, Mehrkar A BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):277.

PMID: 38956603 PMC: 11220965. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03480-2.


Policy, practice, and prediction: model-based approaches to evaluating N. gonorrhoeae antibiotic susceptibility test uptake in Australia.

Do P, Assefa Y, Batikawai S, Abate M, Reid S BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):498.

PMID: 38760682 PMC: 11100046. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09393-y.


Knowledge support for optimising antibiotic prescribing for common infections in general practices: evaluation of the effectiveness of periodic feedback, decision support during consultations and peer comparisons in a cluster randomised trial....

van Staa T, Sharma A, Palin V, Fahmi A, Cant H, Zhong X BMJ Open. 2023; 13(8):e076296.

PMID: 37607793 PMC: 10445367. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076296.

References
1.
Levitt H, Bamberg M, Creswell J, Frost D, Josselson R, Suarez-Orozco C . Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. Am Psychol. 2018; 73(1):26-46. DOI: 10.1037/amp0000151. View

2.
Tonkin-Crine S, Yardley L, Little P . Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66(10):2215-23. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr279. View

3.
Nowakowska M, van Staa T, Molter A, Ashcroft D, Tsang J, White A . Antibiotic choice in UK general practice: rates and drivers of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019; 74(11):3371-3378. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz345. View

4.
Garg A, Adhikari N, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano M, Devereaux P, Beyene J . Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1223-38. DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223. View

5.
Palin V, Molter A, Belmonte M, Ashcroft D, White A, Welfare W . Antibiotic prescribing for common infections in UK general practice: variability and drivers. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019; 74(8):2440-2450. PMC: 6640319. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkz163. View