» Articles » PMID: 37058300

PFAS-Contaminated Soil Site in Germany: Nontarget Screening Before and After Direct TOP Assay by Kendrick Mass Defect and FindPFΔS

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 14
PMID 37058300
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Soil contaminations with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of great concern due to their persistence, leading to continuous, long-term groundwater contamination. A composite sample from contaminated agricultural soil from northwestern Germany (Brilon-Scharfenberg, North Rhine-Westphalia) was investigated in depth with nontarget screening (NTS) (Kendrick mass defect and MS fragment mass differences with FindPFΔS). Several years ago, selected PFCAs and PFSAs were identified on this site by detection in nearby surface and drinking water. We identified 10 further PFAS classes and 7 C-based PFAS (73 single PFAS) previously unknown in this soil including some novel PFAS. All PFAS classes except for one class comprised sulfonic acid groups and were semi-quantified with PFSA standards from which ∼97% were perfluorinated and are not expected to be degradable. New identifications made up >75% of the prior known PFAS concentration, which was estimated to >30 μg/g. Pentafluorosulfanyl (-SF) PFSAs are the dominant class (∼40%). Finally, the soil was oxidized with the direct TOP (dTOP) assay, revealing PFAA precursors that were covered to a large extent by identified H-containing PFAS and additional TPs (perfluoroalkyl diacids) were detected after dTOP. In this soil, however, dTOP + target analysis covers <23% of the occurring PFAS, highlighting the importance of NTS to characterize PFAS contaminations more comprehensively.

Citing Articles

The Critical Role of Commercial Analytical Reference Standards in the Control of Chemical Risks: The Case of PFAS and Ways Forward.

Trier X, van-Leeuwen S, Brambilla G, Weber R, Webster T Environ Health Perspect. 2025; 133(1):15001.

PMID: 39878487 PMC: 11776498. DOI: 10.1289/EHP12331.


Latest trends in the environmental analysis of PFAS including nontarget analysis and EOF-, AOF-, and TOP-based methodologies.

Baqar M, Chen H, Yao Y, Sun H Anal Bioanal Chem. 2024; 417(3):555-571.

PMID: 39570388 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-024-05643-9.


Using syringe filtration after lab-scale adsorption processes potentially overestimates PFAS adsorption removal efficiency from non-conventional irrigation water.

Zheng Y, Carter E, Zou S, Williams C, Chow A, Chen H J Environ Qual. 2024; 54(1):20-30.

PMID: 39414564 PMC: 11718135. DOI: 10.1002/jeq2.20640.


Zürich II Statement on Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): Scientific and Regulatory Needs.

DeWitt J, Gluge J, Cousins I, Goldenman G, Herzke D, Lohmann R Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2024; 11(8):786-797.

PMID: 39156923 PMC: 11325642. DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00147.


Building Chemical Intuition about Physicochemical Properties of C8-Per-/Polyfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids through Computational Means.

Antle J, LaRock M, Falls Z, Ng C, Atilla-Gokcumen G, Aga D ACS ES T Eng. 2024; 4(1):196-208.

PMID: 38860110 PMC: 11164130. DOI: 10.1021/acsestengg.3c00267.