» Articles » PMID: 37051878

Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Recursive Pattern Processing in Human Adults

Overview
Journal Cogn Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Apr 13
PMID 37051878
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The capacity to generate recursive sequences is a marker of rich, algorithmic cognition, and perhaps unique to humans. Yet, the precise processes driving recursive sequence generation remain mysterious. We investigated three potential cognitive mechanisms underlying recursive pattern processing: hierarchical reasoning, ordinal reasoning, and associative chaining. We developed a Bayesian mixture model to quantify the extent to which these three cognitive mechanisms contribute to adult humans' performance in a sequence generation task. We further tested whether recursive rule discovery depends upon relational information, either perceptual or semantic. We found that the presence of relational information facilitates hierarchical reasoning and drives the generation of recursive sequences across novel depths of center embedding. In the absence of relational information, the use of ordinal reasoning predominates. Our results suggest that hierarchical reasoning is an important cognitive mechanism underlying recursive pattern processing and can be deployed across embedding depths and relational domains.

Citing Articles

Origins of Hierarchical Logical Reasoning.

Dedhe A, Clatterbuck H, Piantadosi S, Cantlon J Cogn Sci. 2023; 47(2):e13250.

PMID: 36739520 PMC: 11057913. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13250.

References
1.
Rey A, Perruchet P, Fagot J . Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: evidence from baboons (Papio Papio). Cognition. 2012; 123(1):180-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.005. View

2.
Martins M, Gingras B, Puig-Waldmueller E, Fitch W . Cognitive representation of "musical fractals": Processing hierarchy and recursion in the auditory domain. Cognition. 2017; 161:31-45. PMC: 5348576. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.001. View

3.
Hauser M, Chomsky N, Fitch W . The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science. 2002; 298(5598):1569-79. DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569. View

4.
Fitch W, Hauser M . Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science. 2004; 303(5656):377-80. DOI: 10.1126/science.1089401. View

5.
de Vries M, Monaghan P, Knecht S, Zwitserlood P . Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition. 2007; 107(2):763-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.002. View