An International Systematic Review Concerning the Effect of Social Media Exposure on Public Compliance with Infection Prevention and Control Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Overview

Journal J Infect Prev

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2023 Apr 13

PMID 37051306

Authors

Rachel Wall

Jean Evers

Deborah Haydock

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Effective health communication is crucial for achieving positive population health outcomes. This is important for infection prevention and control (IPC), which relies on widespread public compliance to be effective. Whilst social media (SM) platforms disseminate health information, there is conflicting evidence to suggest their influence on compliance with public health guidelines.

Objective: To appraise the available evidence and determine the extent to which social media exposure contributes to public compliance with IPC measures.

Methods: A systematic protocol based on the MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines was followed. Observational studies were identified through systematic searches of four electronic databases and a hand search. Following data extraction, eligible studies were quality assessed, and the findings were integrated using narrative synthesis.

Findings: 15 studies were included. The studies located presented heterogeneous designs and findings. A weak positive association was identified, with 60% of the studies observing a positive association between social media and compliance with IPC measures. 26.7% identified a negative correlation, and 13.3% identified no correlation. Several factors were identified to mediate the relationship, including knowledge and conspiracy beliefs.

Discussion: This systematic review identified a weak positive correlation between exposure to social media and public compliance with recommended IPC measures, suggesting that social media should be utilised in future IPC related communication strategies. Social media provides a cost-effective, publicly accessible platform to disseminate accurate information, and neutralise misinformation. Recommendations are made for further research to reduce the uncertainty created by the identification of heterogenous studies.

References

Seale H, Dyer C, Abdi I, Rahman K, Sun Y, Qureshi M . Improving the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19: examining the factors that influence engagement and the impact on individuals. BMC Infect Dis. 2020; 20(1):607. PMC: 7430133. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-05340-9. View

Olcer S, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Brzoska P . Lay perspectives on social distancing and other official recommendations and regulations in the time of COVID-19: a qualitative study of social media posts. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):963. PMC: 7303937. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09079-5. View

Matheson G . We need to talk about reliability: making better use of test-retest studies for study design and interpretation. PeerJ. 2019; 7:e6918. PMC: 6536112. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6918. View

Lim J, Tun Z, Kumar V, Quaye S, Offeddu V, Cook A . Population anxiety and positive behaviour change during the COVID-19 epidemic: Cross-sectional surveys in Singapore, China and Italy. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020; 15(1):45-55. PMC: 7767950. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12785. View

Wang H, Cleary P, Little J, Auffray C . Communicating in a public health crisis. Lancet Digit Health. 2020; 2(10):e503. PMC: 7417177. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30197-7. View

Moorhead S, Hazlett D, Harrison L, Carroll J, Irwin A, Hoving C . A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(4):e85. PMC: 3636326. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1933. View

Bekalu M, Dhawan D, McCloud R, Pinnamaneni R, Viswanath K . Adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures among American adults: the need for consistent and unified messaging. Health Educ Res. 2021; 36(2):178-191. PMC: 7928934. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyab002. View

De Man J, Campbell L, Tabana H, Wouters E . The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(2):e043866. PMC: 7907624. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866. View

Guo Y, Qin W, Wang Z, Yang F . Factors influencing social distancing to prevent the community spread of COVID-19 among Chinese adults. Prev Med. 2020; 143:106385. PMC: 7774485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106385. View

10.

Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J . Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychol Med. 2020; 51(10):1763-1769. PMC: 7298098. DOI: 10.1017/S003329172000224X. View

11.

Al-Hasan A, Khuntia J, Yim D . Threat, Coping, and Social Distance Adherence During COVID-19: Cross-Continental Comparison Using an Online Cross-Sectional Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(11):e23019. PMC: 7677591. DOI: 10.2196/23019. View

12.

Al-Dmour H, Masadeh R, Salman A, Abuhashesh M, Al-Dmour R . Influence of Social Media Platforms on Public Health Protection Against the COVID-19 Pandemic via the Mediating Effects of Public Health Awareness and Behavioral Changes: Integrated Model. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e19996. PMC: 7439806. DOI: 10.2196/19996. View

13.

Atehortua N, Patino S . COVID-19, a tale of two pandemics: novel coronavirus and fake news messaging. Health Promot Int. 2021; 36(2):524-534. PMC: 7928890. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daaa140. View

14.

Xin M, Viswanath K, Li A, Cao W, Hu Y, Lau J . The Effectiveness of Electronic Health Interventions for Promoting HIV-Preventive Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Meta-Analysis Based on an Integrative Framework of Design and Implementation Features. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(5):e15977. PMC: 7281149. DOI: 10.2196/15977. View

15.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

16.

Massaro M, Tamburro P, La Torre M, Dal Mas F, Thomas R, Cobianchi L . Non-pharmaceutical Interventions and the Infodemic on Twitter: Lessons Learned from Italy during the Covid-19 Pandemic. J Med Syst. 2021; 45(4):50. PMC: 7936238. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-021-01726-7. View

17.

Sandercock P . The authors say: 'The data are not so robust because of heterogeneity' - so, how should I deal with this systematic review? Meta-analysis and the clinician. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011; 31(6):615-20. DOI: 10.1159/000326068. View

18.

Jones K, Baldwin K, Lewis P . The potential influence of a social media intervention on risky sexual behavior and Chlamydia incidence. J Community Health Nurs. 2012; 29(2):106-20. DOI: 10.1080/07370016.2012.670579. View

19.

Junior A, Dula J, Mahumane S, Koole O, Enosse S, Fodjo J . Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures in Mozambique: Two Consecutive Online Surveys. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(3). PMC: 7908406. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031091. View

20.

Fridman I, Lucas N, Henke D, Zigler C . Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6(3):e22060. PMC: 7511226. DOI: 10.2196/22060. View