» Articles » PMID: 37047900

Impact of Wound Dressing Changes on Nursing Workload in an Intensive Care Unit

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Apr 13
PMID 37047900
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study is to understand how the type of wound dressing changes (routine or frequent) in patients admitted to intensive care units influences nurses' workload. This study used a database of retrospective and analytical observational study from one Portuguese intensive care unit. The sample included 728 adult patients admitted between 2015 and 2019. The nursing workload was assessed by the TISS-28 scale, both at admission and at discharge. The linear regression results show that patients with frequent dressing changes are associated with a higher nursing workload, both at admission (Coef. 1.65; 95% CI [0.53; 2.77]) and discharge (Coef. 1.27; 95% CI [0.32; 2.22]). In addition, age influences the nursing workload; older people are associated with a higher nursing workload (at admission Coef. 0.07; 95% CI [0.04; 0.10]; at discharge Coef. 0.08; 95% CI [0.05; 0.10]). Additionally, an increase in nursing workload at admission would significantly increase the nursing workload at discharge (Coef. 0.27; 95% CI [0.21; 0.33]). The relative stability of the nursing workload over the studied years is also another important finding (the influence of studied years is non-significant). In conclusion, patients with frequent dressing changes presented higher TISS-28 scores when compared with patients with an exchange of routine dressings, which leads to a higher nursing workload.

Citing Articles

Impact of Early Dressing Removal After Cesarean Section on Wound Healing and Complications: A Systematic Review.

Al-Sulaitti Z, Nelakuditi B, Dandamudi B, Dimaano K, Shah N, AlQassab O Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e70494.

PMID: 39479108 PMC: 11523019. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70494.


Acute care nurses' experience in providing evidence-based care for patients with laparotomy wounds: A scoping review.

Hulbert-Lemmel S, Madhuvu A, Team V Int Wound J. 2023; 21(4):e14591.

PMID: 38151989 PMC: 10961882. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14591.

References
1.
Griffiths P, Saville C, Ball J, Jones J, Pattison N, Monks T . Nursing workload, nurse staffing methodologies and tools: A systematic scoping review and discussion. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019; 103:103487. PMC: 7086229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103487. View

2.
Cullen D, Civetta J, Briggs B, Ferrara L . Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med. 1974; 2(2):57-60. View

3.
Muehler N, Oishi J, Specht M, Rissner F, Reinhart K, Sakr Y . Serial measurement of Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) in a surgical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2010; 25(4):620-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.03.008. View

4.
Teixeira C, Ribeiro O, Fonseca A, Carvalho A . Burnout in intensive care units - a consideration of the possible prevalence and frequency of new risk factors: a descriptive correlational multicentre study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2013; 13(1):38. PMC: 3826848. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-38. View

5.
Schmoeller R, Trindade L, Neis M, Gelbcke F, Pires D . [Nursing workloads and working conditions: integrative review]. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2011; 32(2):368-77. DOI: 10.1590/s1983-14472011000200022. View