» Articles » PMID: 37046542

Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Automatic Detection of Pulmonary Embolism in Chest CT Angiograms

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Apr 13
PMID 37046542
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Since the prompt recognition of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the immediate initiation of treatment can significantly reduce the risk of death, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based application aimed to automatically detect PEs on chest computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) and alert radiologists for an urgent interpretation. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were used to design the application. The associated algorithm used a hybrid 3D/2D UNet topology. The training phase was performed on datasets adequately distributed in terms of vendors, patient age, slice thickness, and kVp. The objective of this study was to validate the performance of the algorithm in detecting suspected PEs on CTAs.

Methods: The validation dataset included 387 anonymized real-world chest CTAs from multiple clinical sites (228 U.S. cities). The data were acquired on 41 different scanner models from five different scanner makers. The ground truth (presence or absence of PE on CTA images) was established by three independent U.S. board-certified radiologists.

Results: The algorithm correctly identified 170 of 186 exams positive for PE (sensitivity 91.4% [95% CI: 86.4-95.0%]) and 184 of 201 exams negative for PE (specificity 91.5% [95% CI: 86.8-95.0%]), leading to an accuracy of 91.5%. False negative cases were either chronic PEs or PEs at the limit of subsegmental arteries and close to partial volume effect artifacts. Most of the false positive findings were due to contrast agent-related fluid artifacts, pulmonary veins, and lymph nodes.

Conclusions: The DL-based algorithm has a high degree of diagnostic accuracy with balanced sensitivity and specificity for the detection of PE on CTAs.

Citing Articles

Research progress in interventional therapy for acute intermediate-high-risk and high-risk pulmonary embolism.

Wang L, Yu C, Hu K, Guo Y, Li Y, Yu S J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(11):7958-7977.

PMID: 39678886 PMC: 11635272. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-1049.


The Role of Advanced Post-processing Techniques in Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography for the Accurate Diagnosis of Pulmonary Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Study.

Ravula P, Mohanakrishnan A, Muralidharan Y, Kanadasan K, Natarajan P Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67583.

PMID: 39310553 PMC: 11416822. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67583.


Potential strength and weakness of artificial intelligence integration in emergency radiology: a review of diagnostic utilizations and applications in patient care optimization.

Fathi M, Eshraghi R, Behzad S, Tavasol A, Bahrami A, Tafazolimoghadam A Emerg Radiol. 2024; 31(6):887-901.

PMID: 39190230 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-024-02278-2.


Enhancing Radiological Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of Image Quality Assessment and Optimization Strategies.

Varghese A, Naik S, Asrar Up Haq Andrabi S, Luharia A, Tivaskar S Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e63016.

PMID: 39050319 PMC: 11268977. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63016.


An Enhanced Mask R-CNN Approach for Pulmonary Embolism Detection and Segmentation.

Dogan K, Selcuk T, Alkan A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(11).

PMID: 38893629 PMC: 11171979. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111102.


References
1.
Cheikh A, Gorincour G, Nivet H, May J, Seux M, Calame P . How artificial intelligence improves radiological interpretation in suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 2022; 32(9):5831-5842. PMC: 8938594. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08645-2. View

2.
Das M, Muhlenbruch G, Helm A, Bakai A, Salganicoff M, Stanzel S . Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism: influence on radiologists' detection performance with respect to vessel segments. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(7):1350-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0889-x. View

3.
Huhtanen H, Nyman M, Mohsen T, Virkki A, Karlsson A, Hirvonen J . Automated detection of pulmonary embolism from CT-angiograms using deep learning. BMC Med Imaging. 2022; 22(1):43. PMC: 8919639. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00763-z. View

4.
Rufener S, Patel S, Kazerooni E, Schipper M, Kelly A . Comparison of on-call radiology resident and faculty interpretation of 4- and 16-row multidetector CT pulmonary angiography with indirect CT venography. Acad Radiol. 2007; 15(1):71-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.030. View

5.
Liu W, Liu M, Guo X, Zhang P, Zhang L, Zhang R . Evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism and clot burden on CTPA with deep learning. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(6):3567-3575. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06699-8. View