» Articles » PMID: 37046246

Complications and Prognosis of Primary Thoracic and Lumbar Giant Cell Tumors Treated by Total Tumor Resection

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2023 Apr 12
PMID 37046246
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Spinal giant cell tumor (SGCT) is a relatively rare primary tumor. En bloc resection is the preferred surgical procedure for it due to its aggressiveness, meanwhile leading to more complications. We reported the characteristics of perioperative complications and local control of total tumor resection including en bloc resection and piecemeal resection for primary thoracic and lumbar spinal giant cell tumors in a single center over 10 years.

Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional and cohort study. Forty-one consecutive patients with SGCTs who underwent total tumor resection from 2010 to 2020 at our institution and were followed up for at least 24 months were reviewed. Surgery data, complication characteristics and local tumor control were collected and compared by different surgical procedure.

Results: Forty-one patients were included, consisting of 18 males and 23 females, with a mean age of 34.2 years. Thirty-one had thoracic vertebra lesions, and 10 had lumbar vertebra lesions. Thirty-five patients were primary cases, and 6 patients were recurrent cases. Eighteen patients were treated by total en bloc spondylectomy (TES), 12 patients underwent en bloc resection according to WBB surgical system, and 11 patients underwent piecemeal resection. The average surgical time was 498 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 2145 ml. A total of 58 complications were recorded, and 30 patients (73.2%) had at least one perioperative complication. All patients were followed up after surgery for at least 2 years. A total of 6 cases had postoperative internal fixation failure, and 4 cases presented local tumor recurrence (9.8%).

Conclusions: Although the surgical technique is difficult and accompanied by a high rate of perioperative complications, en bloc resection can achieve favorable local control in SGCT. When it is too difficult to complete en bloc resection, thoroughly piecemeal resection without residual is also acceptable, given the relatively low recurrence rate.

Citing Articles

Complications and local recurrence of chondrosarcoma and chordoma treated by total tumor resection in thoracic and lumbar spine.

Liu J, Hu P, Liu Z, Wei F BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):237.

PMID: 38532352 PMC: 10964614. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07353-w.


Biomechanical effects of transverse connectors on total en bloc spondylectomy of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Han Y, Ren X, Liang Y, Ma X, Wang X J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):484.

PMID: 37408002 PMC: 10324273. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03977-1.

References
1.
Boriani S, Gasbarrini A, Bandiera S, Ghermandi R, Lador R . Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(12):3932-3941. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4463-y. View

2.
Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Kato S . Total en bloc spondylectomy of the lower lumbar spine: a surgical techniques of combined posterior-anterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 36(1):74-82. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cded6c. View

3.
Boriani S, Bandiera S, Casadei R, Boriani L, Donthineni R, Gasbarrini A . Giant cell tumor of the mobile spine: a review of 49 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(1):E37-45. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182233ccd. View

4.
Xu W, Li X, Huang W, Wang Y, Han S, Chen S . Factors affecting prognosis of patients with giant cell tumors of the mobile spine: retrospective analysis of 102 patients in a single center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 20(3):804-10. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2707-6. View

5.
Rutkowski P, Gaston L, Borkowska A, Stacchiotti S, Gelderblom H, Baldi G . Denosumab treatment of inoperable or locally advanced giant cell tumor of bone - Multicenter analysis outside clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018; 44(9):1384-1390. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.020. View